These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22082195)
1. Current computer modeling cannot explain why two highly similar sequences fold into different structures. Allison JR; Bergeler M; Hansen N; van Gunsteren WF Biochemistry; 2011 Dec; 50(50):10965-73. PubMed ID: 22082195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments. Yang AS; Honig B J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):691-711. PubMed ID: 10966778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contact pair dynamics during folding of two small proteins: chicken villin head piece and the Alzheimer protein beta-amyloid. Mukherjee A; Bagchi B J Chem Phys; 2004 Jan; 120(3):1602-12. PubMed ID: 15268287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accurate prediction for atomic-level protein design and its application in diversifying the near-optimal sequence space. Fromer M; Yanover C Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):682-705. PubMed ID: 19003998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting the effect of a point mutation on a protein fold: the villin and advillin headpieces and their Pro62Ala mutants. Piana S; Laio A; Marinelli F; Van Troys M; Bourry D; Ampe C; Martins JC J Mol Biol; 2008 Jan; 375(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 18022635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Homology modeling of an RNP domain from a human RNA-binding protein: Homology-constrained energy optimization provides a criterion for distinguishing potential sequence alignments. Sahasrabudhe PV; Tejero R; Kitao S; Furuichi Y; Montelione GT Proteins; 1998 Dec; 33(4):558-66. PubMed ID: 9849939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in backbone dynamics of two homologous bacterial albumin-binding modules: implications for binding specificity and bacterial adaptation. Johansson MU; Nilsson H; Evenäs J; Forsén S; Drakenberg T; Björck L; Wikström M J Mol Biol; 2002 Mar; 316(5):1083-99. PubMed ID: 11884146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One-state downhill versus conventional protein folding. Ferguson N; Schartau PJ; Sharpe TD; Sato S; Fersht AR J Mol Biol; 2004 Nov; 344(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 15522284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling three-dimensional protein structures for amino acid sequences of the CASP3 experiment using sequence-derived predictions. Fischer D Proteins; 1999; Suppl 3():61-5. PubMed ID: 10526353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of the amino acid sequence in domain swapping of the B1 domain of protein G. Sirota FL; Héry-Huynh S; Maurer-Stroh S; Wodak SJ Proteins; 2008 Jul; 72(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 18186476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sequence and structural analysis of two designed proteins with 88% identity adopting different folds. Saravanan KM; Balasubramanian H; Nallusamy S; Samuel S Protein Eng Des Sel; 2010 Dec; 23(12):911-8. PubMed ID: 20952437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protein structure prediction by threading methods: evaluation of current techniques. Lemer CM; Rooman MJ; Wodak SJ Proteins; 1995 Nov; 23(3):337-55. PubMed ID: 8710827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A turning point in the knowledge of the structure-function-activity relations of elastin]. Alix AJ J Soc Biol; 2001; 195(2):181-93. PubMed ID: 11727705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The design and characterization of two proteins with 88% sequence identity but different structure and function. Alexander PA; He Y; Chen Y; Orban J; Bryan PN Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jul; 104(29):11963-8. PubMed ID: 17609385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization by NMR and molecular modeling of the binding of polyisoprenols and polyisoprenyl recognition sequence peptides: 3D structure of the complexes reveals sites of specific interactions. Zhou GP; Troy FA Glycobiology; 2003 Feb; 13(2):51-71. PubMed ID: 12626407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. De novo protein design. I. In search of stability and specificity. Koehl P; Levitt M J Mol Biol; 1999 Nov; 293(5):1161-81. PubMed ID: 10547293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selecting sequences that fold into a defined 3D structure: A new approach for protein design based on molecular dynamics and energetics. Morra G; Baragli C; Colombo G Biophys Chem; 2010 Feb; 146(2-3):76-84. PubMed ID: 19926206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protein structure prediction based on sequence similarity. Jaroszewski L Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 569():129-56. PubMed ID: 19623489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring local and non-local interactions for protein stability by structural motif engineering. Niggemann M; Steipe B J Mol Biol; 2000 Feb; 296(1):181-95. PubMed ID: 10656826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The HPr proteins from the thermophile Bacillus stearothermophilus can form domain-swapped dimers. Sridharan S; Razvi A; Scholtz JM; Sacchettini JC J Mol Biol; 2005 Feb; 346(3):919-31. PubMed ID: 15713472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]