These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22082403)

  • 1. Learning, thinking, and emoting with discourse technologies.
    Graesser AC
    Am Psychol; 2011 Nov; 66(8):746-57. PubMed ID: 22082403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coh-metrix: analysis of text on cohesion and language.
    Graesser AC; McNamara DS; Louwerse MM; Cai Z
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 May; 36(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 15354684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension.
    Graesser AC; McNamara DS
    Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Apr; 3(2):371-98. PubMed ID: 25164300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AutoTutor: a tutor with dialogue in natural language.
    Graesser AC; Lu S; Jackson GT; Mitchell HH; Ventura M; Olney A; Louwerse MM
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 May; 36(2):180-92. PubMed ID: 15354683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New tools for learning.
    Dickinson D
    Turk J Pediatr; 1999; 41 Suppl():127-35. PubMed ID: 10770084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using temporal cohesion to predict temporal coherence in narrative and expository texts.
    Duran ND; McCarthy PM; Graesser AC; McNamara DS
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 May; 39(2):212-23. PubMed ID: 17695347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cohesion network analysis of CSCL participation.
    Dascalu M; McNamara DS; Trausan-Matu S; Allen LK
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):604-619. PubMed ID: 28409485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Arguing collaboratively: Argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building.
    Felton M; Garcia-Mila M; Villarroel C; Gilabert S
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):372-86. PubMed ID: 25975525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-based assessment of student-constructed responses.
    Magliano JP; Graesser AC
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):608-21. PubMed ID: 22581494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptions of (in)sincerity in satirical discourse: A study of word reading times using minimally different texts.
    Skalicky S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2023 Dec; 77(4):247-261. PubMed ID: 37561531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A theoretically motivated method for automatically evaluating texts for gist inferences.
    Wolfe CR; Dandignac M; Reyna VF
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2419-2437. PubMed ID: 31342470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactive computer-assisted instruction in acid-base physiology for mobile computer platforms.
    Longmuir KJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 24585467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies.
    Roschelle JM; Pea RD; Hoadley CM; Gordin DN; Means BM
    Future Child; 2000; 10(2):76-101. PubMed ID: 11255710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arguing to learn in science: the role of collaborative, critical discourse.
    Osborne J
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5977):463-6. PubMed ID: 20413492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving text comprehension: scaffolding adolescents into strategic reading.
    Ukrainetz TA
    Semin Speech Lang; 2015 Feb; 36(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 25633141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Roles of Implicit Understanding of Engineering Ethics in Student Teams' Discussion.
    Lee EA; Grohman M; Gans NR; Tacca M; Brown MJ
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1755-1774. PubMed ID: 28005255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemispheric asymmetries in discourse processing: evidence from false memories for lists and texts.
    Ben-Artzi E; Faust M; Moeller E
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):430-8. PubMed ID: 18951910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conversation level syntax similarity metric.
    Boghrati R; Hoover J; Johnson KM; Garten J; Dehghani M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Jun; 50(3):1055-1073. PubMed ID: 28699124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visualizing complex processes using a cognitive-mapping tool to support the learning of clinical reasoning.
    Wu B; Wang M; Grotzer TA; Liu J; Johnson JM
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Aug; 16(1):216. PubMed ID: 27549130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Video-based cases disrupt deep critical thinking in problem-based learning.
    Basu Roy R; McMahon GT
    Med Educ; 2012 Apr; 46(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 22429179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.