These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22082526)

  • 1. Novel magnetically induced membrane vibration (MMV) for fouling control in membrane bioreactors.
    Bilad MR; Mezohegyi G; Declerck P; Vankelecom IF
    Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 22082526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of filtration conditions on membrane fouling and scouring aeration effectiveness in submerged membrane bioreactors to treat municipal wastewater.
    Nywening JP; Zhou H
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(14):3548-58. PubMed ID: 19501871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Harvesting microalgal biomass using a magnetically induced membrane vibration (MMV) system: filtration performance and energy consumption.
    Bilad MR; Discart V; Vandamme D; Foubert I; Muylaert K; Vankelecom IF
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Jun; 138():329-38. PubMed ID: 23624051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a supervisory control system for energy savings in membrane bioreactors.
    Huyskens C; Brauns E; Van Hoof E; Diels L; De Wever H
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(3):1443-53. PubMed ID: 21112605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility study of moving-fiber biofilm membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: process control.
    Phattaranawik J; Leiknes T
    Water Res; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2227-34. PubMed ID: 21324506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of membrane fouling under constant and variable organic loadings in submerge membrane bioreactors.
    Zhang J; Zhou J; Liu Y; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5407-13. PubMed ID: 20684971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relation between EPS adherence, viscoelastic properties, and MBR operation: Biofouling study with QCM-D.
    Sweity A; Ying W; Ali-Shtayeh MS; Yang F; Bick A; Oron G; Herzberg M
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(19):6430-40. PubMed ID: 22014563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sustainable membrane operation design for the treatment of the synthetic coke wastewater in SMBR.
    Zhou Y; Xu ZL; Munib S; Chen GE; Lu Q
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(8):2115-24. PubMed ID: 19844058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Knowledge-based system for automatic MBR control.
    Comas J; Meabe E; Sancho L; Ferrero G; Sipma J; Monclús H; Rodriguez-Roda I
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(12):2829-36. PubMed ID: 21123912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fouling control in submerged membrane bioreactors.
    Judd S
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):27-34. PubMed ID: 16003958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of fouling of membrane bioreactors in sewage treatment.
    Judd S
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 14982185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a novel Submerged Membrane Electro-Bioreactor (SMEBR): performance for fouling reduction.
    Bani-Melhem K; Elektorowicz M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(9):3298-304. PubMed ID: 20355694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fouling with aerobic granule membrane bioreactor.
    Juang YC; Su A; Fang LH; Lee DJ; Lai JY
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(9):1870-5. PubMed ID: 22020481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors associated with different solid retention times: Relation to membrane fouling.
    Kimura K; Naruse T; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Mar; 43(4):1033-9. PubMed ID: 19059627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of imposed flux on fouling behavior in high rate membrane bioreactor.
    Johir MA; George J; Vigneswaran S; Kandasamy J; Sathasivan A; Grasmick A
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Oct; 122():42-9. PubMed ID: 22424923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Membrane fouling and performance evaluation of conventional membrane bioreactor (MBR), moving biofilm MBR and oxic/anoxic MBR.
    Khan SJ; Ahmad A; Nawaz MS; Hankins NP
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(7):1403-9. PubMed ID: 24718329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of anti-fouling strategies for membrane coupled with upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (MUASB) process.
    Tran TM; Ye Y; Chen V; Stuetz R; Le-Clech P
    Environ Technol; 2013; 34(1-4):521-8. PubMed ID: 23530367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Engineering of an MBR supernatant fouling layer by fine particles addition: a possible way to control cake compressibility.
    Teychene B; Guigui C; Cabassud C
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(5):2060-72. PubMed ID: 21232780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a novel fouling suppression system in membrane bioreactors using an intermittent electric field.
    Akamatsu K; Lu W; Sugawara T; Nakao S
    Water Res; 2010 Feb; 44(3):825-30. PubMed ID: 19897224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seasonal variation in membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater.
    Miyoshi T; Tsuyuhara T; Ogyu R; Kimura K; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Dec; 43(20):5109-18. PubMed ID: 19767055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.