274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22082548)
21. Central washout sign in computer-aided evaluation of breast MRI: preliminary results.
Ko ES; Choi HY; Lee BH; Noh WC; Kim RB
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):256-63. PubMed ID: 21498360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters.
Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Wiberg MK
Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1344-54. PubMed ID: 15596372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast DCE-MRI using pharmacokinetic model and 3-D morphology analysis.
Wang TC; Huang YH; Huang CS; Chen JH; Huang GY; Chang YC; Chang RF
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Apr; 32(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 24439361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dynamic MRI of solitary pulmonary nodules: comparison of enhancement patterns of malignant and benign small peripheral lung lesions.
Kono R; Fujimoto K; Terasaki H; Müller NL; Kato S; Sadohara J; Hayabuchi N; Takamori S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 17179342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Handling a high relaxivity contrast material for dynamic breast MR imaging using higher thresholds for the initial enhancement.
Carbonaro LA; Verardi N; Di Leo G; Sardanelli F
Invest Radiol; 2010 Mar; 45(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 20065856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Typical atypical findings on dynamic MRI of the breast.
Kurz KD; Roy S; Mödder U; Skaane P; Saleh A
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 76(2):195-210. PubMed ID: 19726148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Feature extraction and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted breast image data.
Torheim G; Godtliebsen F; Axelson D; Kvistad KA; Haraldseth O; Rinck PA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1293-301. PubMed ID: 11811829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. T1-weighted 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast using a dual-echo Dixon technique at 3 T.
Dogan BE; Ma J; Hwang K; Liu P; Yang WT
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Oct; 34(4):842-51. PubMed ID: 21769987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement.
Gutierrez RL; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Kurland BF; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 19770321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for assessment of bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease pilot study.
Oto A; Fan X; Mustafi D; Jansen SA; Karczmar GS; Rubin DT; Kayhan A
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1223-30. PubMed ID: 19524458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Distinguishing benign and malignant lesions with time-signal intensity curve of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI scanning].
Yuan HM; Yu JQ; Chu ZG; Peng LQ
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Jul; 42(4):556-9. PubMed ID: 21866648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Frequency of malignancy in lesions classified as probably benign after dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI examination.
Sadowski EA; Kelcz F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 21(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 15834907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.
Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Diagnostic value of a breast MRI score for the prediction of malignancy of breast lesions detected solely with MRI].
Siegmann KC; Moron HU; Baur A; Hahn M; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Bitzer M
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 19452398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Diagnostic efficacy of gadodiamide-enhanced dynamic examination technique in comparison to conventional magnet resonance tomography in exacerbated chronic osteomyelitis].
Rademacher G; Stengel D; Paris S; Cramer J; Mutze S
Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1417-23. PubMed ID: 14556112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. New spatiotemporal features for improved discrimination of benign and malignant lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
Gal Y; Mehnert A; Bradley A; Kennedy D; Crozier S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):645-52. PubMed ID: 21926864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Setoguchi T; Okafuji T; Soeda H; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Tokunaga E; Yamamoto H; Honda H
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e126-32. PubMed ID: 19796900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
