These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22082571)

  • 1. Automated image interpretation computer-assisted diagnostics.
    Foran DJ; Chen W; Yang L
    Anal Cell Pathol (Amst); 2011; 34(6):279-300. PubMed ID: 22082571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quantitative analysis techniques for brain MRI: applications in multiple sclerosis].
    Grimaud J; Zhu YM; Rombaut M
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 2002 Mar; 158(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 11976603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An interactive dynamic analysis and decision support software for MR mammography.
    Ertaş G; Gülçür HO; Tunaci M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jun; 32(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 18343634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated image interpretation and computer-assisted diagnostics.
    Foran DJ; Chen W; Yang L
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 185():77-108. PubMed ID: 23542932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-throughput image analysis in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma.
    Hosken B; Coutinho Endringer D; Prandi Campagnaro B; Uggere de Andrade T; Lenz D
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Jul; 44(7):574-7. PubMed ID: 27095072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated detection of regions of interest for tissue microarray experiments: an image texture analysis.
    Karaçali B; Tözeren A
    BMC Med Imaging; 2007 Mar; 7():2. PubMed ID: 17349041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel automated image analysis system using deep convolutional neural networks can assist to differentiate MDS and AA.
    Kimura K; Tabe Y; Ai T; Takehara I; Fukuda H; Takahashi H; Naito T; Komatsu N; Uchihashi K; Ohsaka A
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13385. PubMed ID: 31527646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated classification of celiac disease during upper endoscopy: Status quo and quo vadis.
    Gadermayr M; Wimmer G; Kogler H; Vécsei A; Merhof D; Uhl A
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Nov; 102():221-226. PubMed ID: 29739614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Opening the black box of machine learning in radiology: can the proximity of annotated cases be a way?
    Baselli G; Codari M; Sardanelli F
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2020 May; 4(1):30. PubMed ID: 32372200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Data-analysis strategies for image-based cell profiling.
    Caicedo JC; Cooper S; Heigwer F; Warchal S; Qiu P; Molnar C; Vasilevich AS; Barry JD; Bansal HS; Kraus O; Wawer M; Paavolainen L; Herrmann MD; Rohban M; Hung J; Hennig H; Concannon J; Smith I; Clemons PA; Singh S; Rees P; Horvath P; Linington RG; Carpenter AE
    Nat Methods; 2017 Aug; 14(9):849-863. PubMed ID: 28858338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comment on: automated registration of sequential breath-hold dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: a comparison of three techniques.
    Melbourne A
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Feb; 31(2):324-6. PubMed ID: 22902467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fully Automated Echocardiogram Interpretation in Clinical Practice.
    Zhang J; Gajjala S; Agrawal P; Tison GH; Hallock LA; Beussink-Nelson L; Lassen MH; Fan E; Aras MA; Jordan C; Fleischmann KE; Melisko M; Qasim A; Shah SJ; Bajcsy R; Deo RC
    Circulation; 2018 Oct; 138(16):1623-1635. PubMed ID: 30354459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting lung cancer prognosis using machine learning.
    Burki TK
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Oct; 17(10):e421. PubMed ID: 27569440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of automated decision aids on performance, operator behaviour and workload in a simulated supervisory control task.
    Röttger S; Bali K; Manzey D
    Ergonomics;