These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22083515)

  • 1. Center-by-center results of a multicenter prospective trial to determine the inter-observer correlation of the simplified POP-Q in describing pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lemos N; Korte JE; Iskander M; Freeman R; Arunkalaivanan A; Rizk D; Halaska M; Medina C; Conceição JC; Parekh M; Martan A; Sorinola O; Wlazlak E; Ghoniem G; Swift S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 May; 23(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 22083515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system.
    Parekh M; Swift S; Lemos N; Iskander M; Freeman B; Arunkalaivanan AS; Martan A; Sorinola O; Rizk D; Halaska M; Surkont G; Medina C; Conceicao JC; Korte JE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2011 Jun; 22(6):645-50. PubMed ID: 21431391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility, inter- and intra-rater reliability of physiotherapists measuring prolapse using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system.
    Stark D; Dall P; Abdel-Fattah M; Hagen S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Jun; 21(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 20107767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system.
    Swift S; Morris S; McKinnie V; Freeman R; Petri E; Scotti RJ; Dwyer P
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2006 Nov; 17(6):615-20. PubMed ID: 16598414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Utilize the simplified POP-Q system in the clinical practice of staging for pelvic organ prolapse: comparative analysis with standard POP-Q system].
    Zhang H; Zhu L; Xu T; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 51(7):510-4. PubMed ID: 27465870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system in left lateral position.
    Digesu GA; Athanasiou S; Cardozo L; Hill S; Khullar V
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Aug; 20(8):979-83. PubMed ID: 19387526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse.
    Manonai J; Mouritsen L; Palma P; Contreras-Ortiz O; Korte JE; Swift S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2011 Mar; 22(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 20936258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital assessment and quantification of pelvic organ prolapse (DPOP-Q): a randomised cross-over diagnostic agreement trial.
    Thiagamoorthy G; Zacchè M; Cardozo L; Naidu M; Giarenis I; Flint R; Srikrishna S; Robinson D
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 26423265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Eyeball" POP-Q examination: shortcut or valid assessment tool?
    Karp DR; Peterson TV; Jean-Michel M; Lefevre R; Davila GW; Aguilar VC
    Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1005-9. PubMed ID: 20440479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study to evaluate the intersystem association and reliability between standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system and simplified pelvic organ prolapse scoring system.
    Raizada N; Mittal P; Suri J; Puri A; Sharma V
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2014 Dec; 64(6):421-4. PubMed ID: 25489146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Index (POP-Q-I): a novel interpretation of the POP-Q system for optimization of POP research.
    Lemos NL; Auge AP; Lunardelli JL; Carramão Sda S; Faria AL; Aoki T
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2008 Jul; 19(7):995-7. PubMed ID: 18217176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementation of a standardized digital rectal exam to improve the accuracy of rectocele diagnosis.
    Crane AK; Geller EJ; Myers EM; Fenderson JL; Wells E; Jannelli M; Connolly A; Matthews CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Jan; 26(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 25062655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ prolapse: reliability of assessment and correlation with clinical findings and pelvic floor symptoms.
    Lakeman MM; Zijta FM; Peringa J; Nederveen AJ; Stoker J; Roovers JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1547-54. PubMed ID: 22531955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A nationwide population-based survey on the prevalence and risk factors of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in adult women in China - a pelvic organ prolapse quantification system-based study.
    Pang H; Zhang L; Han S; Li Z; Gong J; Liu Q; Liu X; Wang J; Xia Z; Lang J; Xu T; Zhu L
    BJOG; 2021 Jul; 128(8):1313-1323. PubMed ID: 33619817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of the Relationship Between Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) Staging and Decubitus Ulcer in Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Samantray SR; Mohapatra I
    Cureus; 2021 Jan; 13(1):e12443. PubMed ID: 33552762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Ghanbari Z; Peivandi S; Pasikhani MD; Darabi F
    Ethiop J Health Sci; 2020 Nov; 30(6):921-928. PubMed ID: 33883837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system?
    Madhu C; Swift S; Moloney-Geany S; Drake MJ
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Aug; 37(S6):S39-S43. PubMed ID: 30614056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pelvic floor imaging with MR defecography: correlation with gynecologic pelvic organ prolapse quantification.
    Swamy N; Bajaj G; Olliphant SS; Henry JA; Jambhekar K; Pandey T; Ram R
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32211947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship of degree of uterine prolapse between pelvic examination in lithotomy position with cervical traction and pelvic examination in standing position.
    Leerasiri P; Wachasiddhisilpa P; Hengrasmee P; Asumpinwong C
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1173-1177. PubMed ID: 29508045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of single- versus multicenter outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse repair using a mesh-capturing device.
    Morcos E; Altman D; Hunde D; Falconer C;
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 28547270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.