These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22083734)

  • 1. Standardization in synthetic biology.
    Müller KM; Arndt KM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 813():23-43. PubMed ID: 22083734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BioBrick assembly standards and techniques and associated software tools.
    Røkke G; Korvald E; Pahr J; Oyås O; Lale R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1116():1-24. PubMed ID: 24395353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Promoting microbiology education through the iGEM synthetic biology competition.
    Kelwick R; Bowater L; Yeoman KH; Bowater RP
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2015 Aug; 362(16):. PubMed ID: 26260156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardization in synthetic biology: an engineering discipline coming of age.
    Decoene T; De Paepe B; Maertens J; Coussement P; Peters G; De Maeseneire SL; De Mey M
    Crit Rev Biotechnol; 2018 Aug; 38(5):647-656. PubMed ID: 28954542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time to Get Serious about Measurement in Synthetic Biology.
    Beal J; Haddock-Angelli T; Farny N; Rettberg R
    Trends Biotechnol; 2018 Sep; 36(9):869-871. PubMed ID: 29880229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Development of international genetically engineered machine competition in China].
    Zhao X; Lu S; Wang J; Hu X; Rao X; Hu Q
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1915-1922. PubMed ID: 30584702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cultivation of college students' innovative and entrepreneurial thinking and ability based on Synthetic Biology and iGEM].
    Jian T; Li S; Liao H; Zhou J; Zhu Q; Huang X
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2022 Apr; 38(4):1619-1630. PubMed ID: 35470632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assembly of highly standardized gene fragments for high-level production of porphyrins in E. coli.
    Nielsen MT; Madsen KM; Seppälä S; Christensen U; Riisberg L; Harrison SJ; Møller BL; Nørholm MH
    ACS Synth Biol; 2015 Mar; 4(3):274-82. PubMed ID: 24905856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The fusion of biology, computer science, and engineering: towards efficient and successful synthetic biology.
    Linshiz G; Goldberg A; Konry T; Hillson NJ
    Perspect Biol Med; 2012; 55(4):503-20. PubMed ID: 23502561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Bringing scientific research education closer to undergraduates through International Genetically Engineered Machine competition].
    Lü Y; Zhang Y; Wang B; Li C; Zhang H; Ouyang Q
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1923-1930. PubMed ID: 30584703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assembly of BioBrick standard biological parts using three antibiotic assembly.
    Shetty R; Lizarazo M; Rettberg R; Knight TF
    Methods Enzymol; 2011; 498():311-26. PubMed ID: 21601683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Preface for special column on iGEM (2018)].
    Zhang H; Chen GQ
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1871-1873. PubMed ID: 30584697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advancing undergraduate synthetic biology education: insights from a Canadian iGEM student perspective.
    Diep P; Boucinha A; Kell B; Yeung BA; Chen X; Tsyplenkov D; Serra D; Escobar A; Gnanapragasam A; Emond CA; Sajtovich VA; Mahadevan R; Kilkenny DM; Gini-Newman G; Kaern M; Ingalls B
    Can J Microbiol; 2021 Oct; 67(10):749-770. PubMed ID: 34237221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Synthetic Biology Ethics at iGEM: iGEMer Perspectives.
    Whitford CM; Lübke NC; Rückert C
    Trends Biotechnol; 2018 Oct; 36(10):985-987. PubMed ID: 30244697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strengths and limitations of the federal guidance on synthetic DNA.
    Adam L; Kozar M; Letort G; Mirat O; Srivastava A; Stewart T; Wilson ML; Peccoud J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Mar; 29(3):208-10. PubMed ID: 21390018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assembly of standardized DNA parts using BioBrick ends in E. coli.
    Ho-Shing O; Lau KH; Vernon W; Eckdahl TT; Campbell AM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 852():61-76. PubMed ID: 22328426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Synthetic biology: programming cells for biomedical applications.
    Hörner M; Reischmann N; Weber W
    Perspect Biol Med; 2012; 55(4):490-502. PubMed ID: 23502560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synthetic DNA firms embrace hazardous agents guidance but remain wary of automated 'best-match'.
    Eisenstein M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 28(12):1225-6. PubMed ID: 21139590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment of Synthetic Biology.
    Epstein MM; Vermeire T
    Trends Biotechnol; 2016 Aug; 34(8):601-603. PubMed ID: 27234301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Synthetic biology: evolution or revolution? A co-founder's perspective.
    Gardner TS; Hawkins K
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2013 Dec; 17(6):871-7. PubMed ID: 24126196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.