145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22083766)
1. Time-delay spectrometry measurement of magnitude and phase of hydrophone response.
Wear KA; Gammell PM; Maruvada S; Liu Y; Harris GR
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Nov; 58(11):2325-33. PubMed ID: 22083766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved measurement of acoustic output using complex deconvolution of hydrophone sensitivity.
Wear KA; Gammell PM; Maruvada S; Liu Y; Harris GR
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Jan; 61(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 24402896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling of anomalies due to hydrophones in continuous-wave ultrasound fields.
Huttunen T; Kaipio JP; Hynynen K
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2003 Nov; 50(11):1486-500. PubMed ID: 14682632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydrophone measurements in diagnostic ultrasound fields.
Harris GR
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1988; 35(2):87-101. PubMed ID: 18290135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary reciprocity-based method for calibration of hydrophone magnitude and phase sensitivity: complete tests at frequencies from 1 to 7 MHz.
Oliveira EG; Costa-Felix RP; Machado JC
Ultrasonics; 2015 Apr; 58():87-95. PubMed ID: 25578371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Broadband PVDF membrane hydrophone for comparisons of hydrophone calibration methods up to 140 MHz.
Wilkens V; Molkenstruck W
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1784-91. PubMed ID: 17941384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Voltage sensitivity response of ultrasonic hydrophones in the frequency range 0.25-2.5 MHz.
Lewin PA; Bautista R; Devaraju V
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Sep; 25(7):1131-7. PubMed ID: 10574344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interlaboratory evaluation of hydrophone sensitivity calibration from 0.1 to 2 MHz via time delay spectrometry.
Harris GR; Gammell PM; Lewin PA; Radulescu EG
Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):349-53. PubMed ID: 15047310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of a polymer film optical fiber hydrophone for use in the range 1 to 20 MHz: a comparison with PVDF needle and membrane hydrophones.
Beard PC; Hurrell AM; Mills TN
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2000; 47(1):256-64. PubMed ID: 18238538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Membrane hydrophone phase characteristics through nonlinear acoustics measurements.
Bloomfield PE; Gandhi G; Lewin PA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Nov; 58(11):2418-37. PubMed ID: 22083775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Angular response of miniature ultrasonic hydrophones.
Shombert DG; Smith SW; Harris GR
Med Phys; 1982; 9(4):484-92. PubMed ID: 7110078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variation of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound (HITU) Pressure Field Characterization: Effects of Hydrophone Choice, Nonlinearity, Spatial Averaging and Complex Deconvolution.
Liu Y; Wear KA; Harris GR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):2329-2342. PubMed ID: 28735734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation of the repeatability and reproducibility of hydrophone measurements of medical ultrasound fields.
Martin E; Treeby B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Mar; 145(3):1270. PubMed ID: 31067926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Progress in developing a thermal method for measuring the output power of medical ultrasound transducers that exploits the pyroelectric effect.
Zeqiri B; Zauhar G; Hodnett M; Barrie J
Ultrasonics; 2011 May; 51(4):420-4. PubMed ID: 21163509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lorentz-force hydrophone characterization.
Grasland-Mongrain P; Mari JM; Gilles B; Poizat A; Chapelon JY; Lafon C
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Feb; 61(2):353-63. PubMed ID: 24474140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a PVDF membrane hydrophone for use in air-coupled ultrasonic transducer calibration.
Galbraith W; Hayward G
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1998; 45(6):1549-58. PubMed ID: 18250002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency response of PVDF needle-type hydrophones.
Fay B; Ludwig G; Lankjaer C; Lewin PA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 8085292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nominal Versus Actual Spatial Resolution: Comparison of Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size for Membrane, Needle, Capsule, and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones.
Wear KA; Shah A
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2023 Feb; 70(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 36178990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calibration of ultrasonic hydrophone probes up to 100 MHz using time gating frequency analysis and finite amplitude waves.
Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Wójcik J; Nowicki A
Ultrasonics; 2003 Jun; 41(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 12782255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Needle Hydrophones: Predictions From Four Theoretical Forms Compared With Measurements.
Wear KA; Baker C; Miloro P
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Oct; 65(10):1781-1788. PubMed ID: 30010557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
