These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
28. A dual modality approach to quantitative quality control in emission tomography. Thomas MD; Bailey DL; Livieratos L Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):N187-94. PubMed ID: 16030376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automated quality control of emission-transmission misalignment for attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT-CT systems. Chen J; Caputlu-Wilson SF; Shi H; Galt JR; Faber TL; Garcia EV J Nucl Cardiol; 2006; 13(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16464716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Role of noninvasive imaging in cardiology]. Gaemperli O Praxis (Bern 1994); 2013 Jan; 102(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 23384928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT images with X-ray CT: effects of registration errors between X-ray CT and SPECT. Takahashi Y; Murase K; Higashino H; Mochizuki T; Motomura N Ann Nucl Med; 2002 Sep; 16(6):431-5. PubMed ID: 12416584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimisation of protocol for low dose CT-derived attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging. Preuss R; Weise R; Lindner O; Fricke E; Fricke H; Burchert W Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Jun; 35(6):1133-41. PubMed ID: 18193221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of myocardial perfusion evaluation with single versus dual-energy CT and effect of beam-hardening artifacts. Carrascosa PM; Cury RC; Deviggiano A; Capunay C; Campisi R; López de Munain M; Vallejos J; Tajer C; Rodriguez-Granillo GA Acad Radiol; 2015 May; 22(5):591-9. PubMed ID: 25680523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The value of registration correction in the attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT studies using low resolution computed tomography images. Tonge CM; Ellul G; Pandit M; Lawson RS; Shields RA; Arumugam P; Prescott MC Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Nov; 27(11):843-52. PubMed ID: 17021423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Criteria for the addition of prone imaging to myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography for inferior wall. Nakaya K; Onoguchi M; Nishimura Y; Kiso K; Otsuka H; Nouno Y; Shibutani T; Yasuda E Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Sep; 38(9):748-755. PubMed ID: 28692492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. SPECT/CT evaluation of unusual physiologic radioiodine biodistributions: pearls and pitfalls in image interpretation. Glazer DI; Brown RK; Wong KK; Savas H; Gross MD; Avram AM Radiographics; 2013; 33(2):397-418. PubMed ID: 23479704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Attenuation correction: eternal dilemma or real improvement? Hendel RC Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Mar; 49(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 15724134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The imaging of neuroendocrine tumors using single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. Upadhyay B; Lu SJ; Navalkissoor S; Gnanasegaran G; Buscombe J Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Jun; 59(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 25719486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. What is the benefit of CT-based attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPET? Apostolopoulos DJ; Savvopoulos C Hell J Nucl Med; 2016; 19(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 27331200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Artifacts in Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion SPECT, using Cedars-Sinai QPS Software. Malek H; Yaghoobi N; Hedayati R J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 24(2):534-542. PubMed ID: 27834038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]