203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22084190)
21. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST): new guidelines.
Tsuchida Y; Therasse P
Med Pediatr Oncol; 2001 Jul; 37(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11466715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. LI-RADS: a case-based review of the new categorization of liver findings in patients with end-stage liver disease.
Purysko AS; Remer EM; Coppa CP; Leão Filho HM; Thupili CR; Veniero JC
Radiographics; 2012; 32(7):1977-95. PubMed ID: 23150853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Response to treatment series: part 2, tumor response assessment--using new and conventional criteria.
Yaghmai V; Miller FH; Rezai P; Benson AB; Salem R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jul; 197(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 21701006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Imaging for oncologic staging and follow-up: review of current methods and novel approaches.
Cademartiri F; Luccichenti G; Maffei E; Fusaro M; Palumbo A; Soliani P; Sianesi M; Zompatori M; Crisi G; Krestin GR
Acta Biomed; 2008 Aug; 79(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 18788502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evidence-based radiology: step 3--primary literature validity (critical appraisal).
Cronin P
Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 19480898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Image-based evaluation of tumor response to treatment: where is radiology today?
Kharuzhyk S; Fabel M; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Kauczor HU
Exp Oncol; 2008 Sep; 30(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 18806739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ACR Appropriateness Criteria radiologic management of hepatic malignancy.
Kouri BE; Funaki BS; Ray CE; Abou-Alfa GK; Burke CT; Darcy MD; Fidelman N; Greene FL; Harrison SA; Kinney TB; Kostelic JK; Lorenz JM; Nair AV; Nemcek AA; Owens CA; Saad WE; Vatakencherry G
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Dec; 9(12):919-25. PubMed ID: 23206650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Limitations with the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) guidance in disseminated pediatric malignancy.
Barnacle AM; McHugh K
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2006 Feb; 46(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 16231313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Imaging response assessment in oncology.
Curran SD; Muellner AU; Schwartz LH
Cancer Imaging; 2006 Oct; 6(Spec No A):S126-30. PubMed ID: 17114065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® posttreatment follow-up of prostate cancer.
Casalino DD; Remer EM; Arellano RS; Bishoff JT; Coursey CA; Dighe M; Eggli DF; Fulgham P; Israel GM; Lazarus E; Leyendecker JR; Nikolaidis P; Papanicolaou N; Prasad S; Ramchandani P; Sheth S; Vikram R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Dec; 8(12):863-71. PubMed ID: 22137005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Value management program: performance, quantification, and presentation of imaging value-added actions.
Patel S
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Mar; 12(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 25441482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improving accuracy in reporting CT scans of oncology patients: assessing the effect of education and feedback interventions on the application of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria.
Andoh H; McNulty NJ; Lewis PJ
Acad Radiol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 23452481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Professional norms regarding how radiologists handle incidental findings.
Brown SD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Apr; 10(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 23545084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Turf wars in radiology: the past, present, and future importance of training standards in imaging.
Rao VM; Levin DC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jul; 2(7):602-6. PubMed ID: 17411885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. On the logistics of interpretive radiology reporting: moving beyond procrustes.
Brenner RJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Aug; 6(8):544-6. PubMed ID: 19643379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: are response evaluation criteria in solid tumors reliable?
Forner A; Ayuso C; Varela M; Rimola J; Hessheimer AJ; de Lope CR; Reig M; Bianchi L; Llovet JM; Bruix J
Cancer; 2009 Feb; 115(3):616-23. PubMed ID: 19117042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors].
Duffaud F; Therasse P
Bull Cancer; 2000 Dec; 87(12):881-6. PubMed ID: 11174117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. ACR appropriateness criteria on suspected congenital heart disease in adults.
Ho VB
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Feb; 5(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18242524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Criteria for radiological assessment of therapy response: criteria-based appraisal].
D'Anastasi M; Schramm NA; Reiser MF; Graser A
Radiologe; 2013 Apr; 53(4):322-8. PubMed ID: 23553412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evidence in diagnostic imaging: going beyond accuracy.
Reed MH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Feb; 9(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 22305692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
