These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22084849)

  • 1. The needle in the haystack: international consortia and the return of individual research results.
    Wallace SE
    J Law Med Ethics; 2011; 39(4):631-9. PubMed ID: 22084849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The return of results of deceased research participants.
    Tassé AM
    J Law Med Ethics; 2011; 39(4):621-30. PubMed ID: 22084848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Return of research results: general principles and international perspectives.
    Lévesque E; Joly Y; Simard J
    J Law Med Ethics; 2011; 39(4):583-92. PubMed ID: 22084844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familial communication of research results: a need to know?
    Black L; McClellan KA
    J Law Med Ethics; 2011; 39(4):605-13. PubMed ID: 22084846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Considerations for Returning Research Results to Culturally Diverse Participants and Families of Decedents.
    Garrison NA
    J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(3):569-75. PubMed ID: 26479567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legal aspects of genetic databases for international biomedical research: the example of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC).
    Romeo-Casabona C; Nicolás P; Knoppers BM; Joly Y; Wallace SE; Chalmers D; Dyke S; Kennedy K; Troncoso A; Kaan T; Rial-Sebbag E;
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2012; (37):15-34. PubMed ID: 23520913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy.
    Bredenoord AL; Onland-Moret NC; Van Delden JJ
    Hum Mutat; 2011 Aug; 32(8):861-7. PubMed ID: 21538687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disclosure of individual research results in clinico-genomic trials: challenges, classification and criteria for decision-making.
    Kollek R; Petersen I
    J Med Ethics; 2011 May; 37(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 21345860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Information disclosure in population-based research involving genetics: a framework for the practice of ethics in epidemiology.
    Kristman VL; Kreiger N
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 18(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 18083547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The return of individual research findings in paediatric genetic research.
    Hens K; Nys H; Cassiman JJ; Dierickx K
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Mar; 37(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 21059631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethical issues in genetic research: disclosure and informed consent.
    Reilly PR; Boshar MF; Holtzman SH
    Nat Genet; 1997 Jan; 15(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 8988163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent in medical research. Doctors are arrogant to think they need to debate issue of patient consent.
    Bratt DE
    BMJ; 1997 May; 314(7092):1477. PubMed ID: 9167569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Return of individual genomic research results: what do consent forms tell participants?
    Pereira S; Oliver Robinson J; McGuire AL
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Nov; 24(11):1524-1529. PubMed ID: 27329739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction: return of research results: how should research results be handled?
    Knoppers BM; Lévesque E
    J Law Med Ethics; 2011; 39(4):574-6. PubMed ID: 22084842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pediatric Cancer Genetics Research and an Evolving Preventive Ethics Approach for Return of Results after Death of the Subject.
    Scollon S; Bergstrom K; McCullough LB; McGuire AL; Gutierrez S; Kerstein R; Parsons DW; Plon SE
    J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(3):529-37. PubMed ID: 26479562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biobanks and the return of research results: out with the old and in with the new?
    Zawati MH; Rioux A
    J Law Med Ethics; 2011; 39(4):614-20. PubMed ID: 22084847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Publication-related risks to privacy: ethical implications of pedigree studies.
    Powers M
    IRB; 1993; 15(4):7-11. PubMed ID: 11652150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stakeholder views on returning research results.
    Haga SB; Zhao JQ
    Adv Genet; 2013; 84():41-81. PubMed ID: 24262096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consenting for current genetic research: is Canadian practice adequate?
    Jaitovich Groisman I; Egalite N; Godard B
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():80. PubMed ID: 25410958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.