290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22086062)
1. From karyotyping to array-CGH in prenatal diagnosis.
Lichtenbelt KD; Knoers NV; Schuring-Blom GH
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2011; 135(3-4):241-50. PubMed ID: 22086062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies.
Lee CN; Lin SY; Lin CH; Shih JC; Lin TH; Su YN
BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):614-25. PubMed ID: 22313859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Array-based approaches in prenatal diagnosis.
Brady PD; Devriendt K; Deprest J; Vermeesch JR
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 838():151-71. PubMed ID: 22228011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. De novo 16p13.11 microdeletion identified by high-resolution array CGH in a fetus with increased nuchal translucency.
Law LW; Lau TK; Fung TY; Leung TY; Wang CC; Choy KW
BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 19018765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SNP array analysis in constitutional and cancer genome diagnostics--copy number variants, genotyping and quality control.
de Leeuw N; Hehir-Kwa JY; Simons A; Geurts van Kessel A; Smeets DF; Faas BH; Pfundt R
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2011; 135(3-4):212-21. PubMed ID: 21934286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hillman SC; Pretlove S; Coomarasamy A; McMullan DJ; Davison EV; Maher ER; Kilby MD
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20658510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative genomic hybridization and prenatal diagnosis.
Van den Veyver IB; Beaudet AL
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 18(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 16601480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular karyotyping: array CGH quality criteria for constitutional genetic diagnosis.
Vermeesch JR; Melotte C; Froyen G; Van Vooren S; Dutta B; Maas N; Vermeulen S; Menten B; Speleman F; De Moor B; Van Hummelen P; Marynen P; Fryns JP; Devriendt K
J Histochem Cytochem; 2005 Mar; 53(3):413-22. PubMed ID: 15750031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid prenatal diagnosis using uncultured amniocytes and oligonucleotide array CGH.
Bi W; Breman AM; Venable SF; Eng PA; Sahoo T; Lu XY; Patel A; Beaudet AL; Cheung SW; White LD
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Oct; 28(10):943-9. PubMed ID: 18792925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of chromosomal imbalances in children with idiopathic mental retardation by array based comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH).
Schoumans J; Ruivenkamp C; Holmberg E; Kyllerman M; Anderlid BM; Nordenskjöld M
J Med Genet; 2005 Sep; 42(9):699-705. PubMed ID: 16141005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microarray comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: a review.
Hillman SC; McMullan DJ; Williams D; Maher ER; Kilby MD
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 40(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 22887694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oligonucleotide microarrays in constitutional genetic diagnosis.
Keren B; Le Caignec C
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2011 Jun; 11(5):521-32. PubMed ID: 21707460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of fetal submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in failed array CGH samples: copy number by sequencing as an alternative to microarrays for invasive fetal testing.
Cohen K; Tzika A; Wood H; Berri S; Roberts P; Mason G; Sheridan E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 25510919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience.
Vialard F; Molina Gomes D; Leroy B; Quarello E; Escalona A; Le Sciellour C; Serazin V; Roume J; Ville Y; de Mazancourt P; Selva J
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2009; 25(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 19521095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prenatally diagnosed de novo segmental amplification or deletion by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization: A retrospective study.
Peng HH; Lee CH; Su SY; Chen KJ; Lee YC; You SH; Lee WF; Cheng PJ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 58(5):662-666. PubMed ID: 31542089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phenotype to genotype characterization by array-comparative genomic hydridization (a-CGH) in case of fetal malformations: A systematic review.
Tonni G; Palmisano M; Perez Zamarian AC; Rabachini Caetano AC; Santana EFM; Peixoto AB; Armbruster-Moraes E; Ruano R; Araujo Júnior E
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 58(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 30638470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [New technologies for genome analysis: Which use in prenatal diagnosis].
Vialard F; Molina Gomes D
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Jan; 39(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 21185761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prenatal detection of a subtle unbalanced chromosome rearrangement by karyotyping, FISH and array comparative genomic hybridization.
Cain CC; Saul DO; Oehler E; Blakemore K; Stetten G
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 18818501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prenatal diagnosis using array-CGH: a French experience.
Rooryck C; Toutain J; Cailley D; Bouron J; Horovitz J; Lacombe D; Arveiler B; Saura R
Eur J Med Genet; 2013 Jul; 56(7):341-5. PubMed ID: 23454632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of chromosomal microarray in the evaluation of abnormal prenatal findings.
Yatsenko SA; Davis S; Hendrix NW; Surti U; Emery S; Canavan T; Speer P; Hill L; Clemens M; Rajkovic A
Clin Genet; 2013 Jul; 84(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 23020214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
