208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22087088)
1. Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: An ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game.
Wu Y; Zhou Y; van Dijk E; Leliveld MC; Zhou X
Front Hum Neurosci; 2011; 5():131. PubMed ID: 22087088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Brain activity in fairness consideration during asset distribution: does the initial ownership play a role?
Wu Y; Hu J; van Dijk E; Leliveld MC; Zhou X
PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e39627. PubMed ID: 22761850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations.
Wang Y; Zhang Z; Bai L; Lin C; Osinsky R; Hewig J
Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():39827. PubMed ID: 28051156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low social status decreases the neural salience of unfairness.
Hu J; Cao Y; Blue PR; Zhou X
Front Behav Neurosci; 2014; 8():402. PubMed ID: 25477798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study.
Qu C; Wang Y; Huang Y
Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():505. PubMed ID: 23986686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
Hu X; Mai X
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 16(7):670-682. PubMed ID: 33769539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to fairness norm violations in antisocial offenders.
Mayer SV; Rauss K; Pourtois G; Jusyte A; Schönenberg M
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 269(6):731-740. PubMed ID: 29397410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.
Ma Q; Hu Y; Jiang S; Meng L
Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 25805967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agency matters! Social preferences in the three-person ultimatum game.
Alexopoulos J; Pfabigan DM; Göschl F; Bauer H; Fischmeister FP
Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():312. PubMed ID: 23818878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Counterfactual comparison modulates fairness consideration in the mini-ultimatum game: an event-related potentials study.
Liang J; Lin H; Xiang J; Wu H; Li X; Liang H; Zheng X
Scand J Psychol; 2015 Apr; 56(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 25586113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game: an ERP study.
Wu Y; Leliveld MC; Zhou X
Biol Psychol; 2011 Dec; 88(2-3):253-62. PubMed ID: 21889968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining.
Li Q; Dai W; Zheng Y; Wang C; Yang Z; Ren Q; Hu K; Liu X
Neuropsychologia; 2022 Sep; 174():108318. PubMed ID: 35830915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Social distance and anonymity modulate fairness consideration: An ERP study.
Yu R; Hu P; Zhang P
Sci Rep; 2015 Aug; 5():13452. PubMed ID: 26293456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.
Ma Q; Qian D; Hu L; Wang L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180459. PubMed ID: 28678888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Influence of Counterfactual Comparison on Fairness in Gain-Loss Contexts.
Li Q; Wang C; Taxer J; Yang Z; Zheng Y; Liu X
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():683. PubMed ID: 28536542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whether others were treated equally affects neural responses to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.
Zheng L; Guo X; Zhu L; Li J; Chen L; Dienes Z
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 10(3):461-6. PubMed ID: 24847114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do we care about the powerless third? An ERP study of the three-person ultimatum game.
Alexopoulos J; Pfabigan DM; Lamm C; Bauer H; Fischmeister FP
Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():59. PubMed ID: 22470328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining.
Boksem MA; De Cremer D
Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 19851940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
