BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22087888)

  • 1. The influence of actual and imputed talker gender on fricative perception, revisited (L).
    Munson B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2631-4. PubMed ID: 22087888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of speaker gender identification in relative fundamental frequency height estimation from multispeaker, brief speech segments.
    Lee CY; Dutton L; Ram G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):384-8. PubMed ID: 20649232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Peruvian Spanish listeners.
    Escudero P; Williams D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):EL1-7. PubMed ID: 21302975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listener expectations and gender bias in nonsibilant fricative perception.
    Babel M; McGuire G
    Phonetica; 2013; 70(1-2):117-51. PubMed ID: 24157437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of perceived sexual orientation on fricative identification.
    Munson B; Jefferson SV; McDonald EC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2427-37. PubMed ID: 16642855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Importance of temporal-envelope speech cues in different spectral regions.
    Ardoint M; Agus T; Sheft S; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL115-21. PubMed ID: 21877769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-language acoustic similarity predicts perceptual assimilation of Canadian English and Canadian French vowels.
    Escudero P; Vasiliev P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 22088028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. You are only as old as you sound: auditory aftereffects in vocal age perception.
    Zäske R; Schweinberger SR
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):283-8. PubMed ID: 21771649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Talker-to-listener distance effects on speech production and perception.
    Cheyne HA; Kalgaonkar K; Clements M; Zurek P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):2052-60. PubMed ID: 19813814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of roving level and spectral range on vowel formant discrimination.
    Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL264-70. PubMed ID: 21974502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Native dialect matters: perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Czech listeners.
    Chládková K; Podlipský VJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL186-92. PubMed ID: 21974490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying isolated, multispeaker Mandarin tones from brief acoustic input: a perceptual and acoustic study.
    Lee CY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):1125-37. PubMed ID: 19206887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relative contributions of speaking fundamental frequency and formant frequencies to gender identification based on isolated vowels.
    Gelfer MP; Mikos VA
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):544-54. PubMed ID: 16301101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of exposure to a single vowel on talker normalization for vowels.
    Morton JR; Sommers MS; Lulich SM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1443-51. PubMed ID: 25786955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential effects of speaker and vowel variability on fricative perception.
    Johnson K
    Lang Speech; 1991; 34 ( Pt 3)():265-79. PubMed ID: 1843527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender differences in familiar voice identification.
    Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():131-40. PubMed ID: 23168357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by inexperienced Russian listeners.
    Gilichinskaya YD; Strange W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):EL80-5. PubMed ID: 20707419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.