123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22087922)
1. Binaural interference in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
Best V; Laback B; Majdak P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2939-50. PubMed ID: 22087922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comodulation masking release induced by controlled electrical stimulation of auditory nerve fibers.
Zirn S; Hempel JM; Schuster M; Hemmert W
Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():60-6. PubMed ID: 23220120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing.
Laback B; Zimmermann I; Majdak P; Baumgartner WD; Pok SM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1515-29. PubMed ID: 21895091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrical field imaging as a means to predict the loudness of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implant patients.
Berenstein CK; Vanpoucke FJ; Mulder JJ; Mens LH
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):28-38. PubMed ID: 20946945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Weighting of cues for fricative place of articulation perception by children wearing cochlear implants.
Hedrick M; Bahng J; von Hapsburg D; Younger MS
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):540-7. PubMed ID: 21604957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of parameter manipulations on spread of excitation measured with electrically-evoked compound action potentials.
van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):465-74. PubMed ID: 22315988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancement of interaural level differences improves sound localization in bimodal hearing.
Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2817-26. PubMed ID: 22087910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: binaural unmasking.
Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Francart T; Scherf F; Dhooge IJ; Deggouj N; Desloovere C; Van de Heyning PH; Offeciers FE; De Raeve L; Wouters J
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(4):240-7. PubMed ID: 19141992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: speech intelligibility and music sound quality.
Magnusson L
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 21190508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users.
van Hoesel RJ
Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 288(1-2):100-13. PubMed ID: 22226928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of interaural differences in envelope shape on the perceived location of sounds (L).
Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):611-4. PubMed ID: 22894182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal interaction in electrical hearing elucidates auditory nerve dynamics in humans.
Karg SA; Lackner C; Hemmert W
Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():10-8. PubMed ID: 23396273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binaural jitter improves interaural time-difference sensitivity of cochlear implantees at high pulse rates.
Laback B; Majdak P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan; 105(2):814-7. PubMed ID: 18182489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Observer weighting of level and timing cues in bilateral cochlear implant users.
van Hoesel RJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3861-72. PubMed ID: 19206812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a temporal fundamental frequency coding strategy for cochlear implants.
Vandali AE; van Hoesel RJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):4023-36. PubMed ID: 21682423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception performance as a function of stimulus pulse rate and processing strategy preference for the Cochlear Nucleus CI24RE device: relation to perceptual threshold and loudness comfort profiles.
Battmer RD; Dillier N; Lai WK; Begall K; Leypon EE; González JC; Manrique M; Morera C; Müller-Deile J; Wesarg T; Zarowski A; Killian MJ; von Wallenberg E; Smoorenburg GF
Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):657-66. PubMed ID: 20583945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.
Goupell MJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1282-97. PubMed ID: 25786942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
