These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22087929)

  • 1. An evaluation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of time-frequency weighted noisy speech.
    Taal CH; Hendriks RC; Heusdens R; Jensen J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3013-27. PubMed ID: 22087929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conversational quality evaluation of artificial bandwidth extension of telephone speech.
    Pulakka H; Laaksonen L; Yrttiaho S; Myllylä V; Alku P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):848-61. PubMed ID: 22894208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between speech recognition in noise and sparseness.
    Li G; Lutman ME; Wang S; Bleeck S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 22107445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement and prediction of the acceptable noise level for single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Fredelake S; Holube I; Schlueter A; Hansen M
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 22316007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
    Cao S; Li L; Wu X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modifying the normalized covariance metric measure to account for nonlinear distortions introduced by noise-reduction algorithms.
    Chen F; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL405-11. PubMed ID: 23656101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of noise-reduced speech for Chinese, Japanese, and English.
    Li J; Xia R; Ying D; Yan Y; Akagi M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3301. PubMed ID: 25480075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech enhancement using a generic noise codebook.
    Srinivasan S; Rao Naidu DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL161-7. PubMed ID: 22894316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility.
    Dubbelboer F; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3937-46. PubMed ID: 19206818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal-to-noise ratio adaptive post-filtering method for intelligibility enhancement of telephone speech.
    Jokinen E; Yrttiaho S; Pulakka H; Vainio M; Alku P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3990-4001. PubMed ID: 23231128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of the division between early and late reflections on intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech.
    Li J; Xia R; Fang Q; Li A; Pan J; Yan Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2801-10. PubMed ID: 25994708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
    Lee PJ; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.