222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22088022)
1. Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.
Kopechek JA; Haworth KJ; Raymond JL; Douglas Mast T; Perrin SR; Klegerman ME; Huang S; Porter TM; McPherson DD; Holland CK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3472-81. PubMed ID: 22088022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface modes and acoustic scattering of microspheres and ultrasound contrast agents.
Falou O; Jafari Sojahrood A; Kumaradas JC; Kolios MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1820-9. PubMed ID: 22978909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Manufacture and acoustical characterisation of a high-frequency contrast agent for targeting applications.
Moran CM; Ross JA; Cunningham C; Butler M; Anderson T; Newby D; Fox KA; McDicken WN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 32(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 16530101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Broadband attenuation measurements of phospholipid-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.
Raymond JL; Haworth KJ; Bader KB; Radhakrishnan K; Griffin JK; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):410-21. PubMed ID: 24262056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-frequency ultrasound scattering from microspheres and single cells.
Baddour RE; Sherar MD; Hunt JW; Czarnota GJ; Kolios MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):934-43. PubMed ID: 15759712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro measurement of attenuation and nonlinear scattering from echogenic liposomes.
Paul S; Russakow D; Nahire R; Nandy T; Ambre AH; Katti K; Mallik S; Sarkar K
Ultrasonics; 2012 Sep; 52(7):962-9. PubMed ID: 22652364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Madsen EL; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic characterization of contrast-to-tissue ratio and axial resolution for dual-frequency contrast-specific acoustic angiography imaging.
Lindsey BD; Rojas JD; Martin KH; Shelton SE; Dayton PA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Oct; 61(10):1668-87. PubMed ID: 25265176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The measurement of ultrasound scattering from individual micron-sized objects and its application in single cell scattering.
Falou O; Rui M; El Kaffas A; Kumaradas JC; Kolios MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):894-902. PubMed ID: 20707459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absolute backscatter coefficient estimates of tissue-mimicking phantoms in the 5-50 MHz frequency range.
McCormick MM; Madsen EL; Deaner ME; Varghese T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):737-43. PubMed ID: 21877789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating concentration of ultrasound contrast agents with backscatter coefficients: experimental and theoretical aspects.
Leithem SM; Lavarello RJ; O'Brien WD; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2295-305. PubMed ID: 22423724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High frequency ultrasound tissue characterization and acoustic microscopy of intracellular changes.
Brand S; Weiss EC; Lemor RM; Kolios MC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1396-407. PubMed ID: 18439747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The acoustic properties, centered on 20 MHZ, of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material and its temperature, frequency and age dependence.
Brewin MP; Pike LC; Rowland DE; Birch MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1292-306. PubMed ID: 18343021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental assessment of four ultrasound scattering models for characterizing concentrated tissue-mimicking phantoms.
Franceschini E; Guillermin R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3735-47. PubMed ID: 23231104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.
Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2007-16. PubMed ID: 26446820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro characterization of liposomes and Optison by acoustic scattering at 3.5 MHz.
Coussios CC; Holland CK; Jakubowska L; Huang SL; MacDonald RC; Nagaraj A; McPherson DD
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Feb; 30(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 14998670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the suitability of broadband attenuation measurement for characterizing contrast microbubbles.
Chatterjee D; Sarkar K; Jain P; Schreppler NE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 15936494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of density and mechanical properties of human trabecular bone in vitro by using ultrasound transmission and backscattering measurements at 0.2-6.7 MHz frequency range.
Hakulinen MA; Day JS; Töyräs J; Timonen M; Kröger H; Weinans H; Kiviranta I; Jurvelin JS
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(8):1629-42. PubMed ID: 15815086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres.
de Jong N; Hoff L
Ultrasonics; 1993; 31(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 8484195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Destruction thresholds of echogenic liposomes with clinical diagnostic ultrasound.
Smith DA; Porter TM; Martinez J; Huang S; MacDonald RC; McPherson DD; Holland CK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 May; 33(5):797-809. PubMed ID: 17412486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
