222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22088022)
21. Attenuation and backscatter estimation using video signal analysis applied to B-mode images.
Knipp BS; Zagzebski JA; Wilson TA; Dong F; Madsen EL
Ultrason Imaging; 1997 Jul; 19(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 9447670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acoustic modeling of shell-encapsulated gas bubbles.
Frinking PJ; de Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1998 May; 24(4):523-33. PubMed ID: 9651962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Attenuation and size distribution measurements of Definity and manipulated Definity populations.
Goertz DE; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1376-88. PubMed ID: 17521801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optimisation of the transmit beam parameters for generation of subharmonic signals in native and altered populations of a commercial microbubble contrast agent SonoVue®.
Ivory AM; Meaney JF; Fagan AJ; Browne JE
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():176-183. PubMed ID: 32036334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Uniform scattering and attenuation of acoustically sorted ultrasound contrast agents: Modeling and experiments.
Segers T; de Jong N; Versluis M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2506. PubMed ID: 27794344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Characterization of acoustic properties of PVA-shelled ultrasound contrast agents: linear properties (part I).
Grishenkov D; Pecorari C; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1127-38. PubMed ID: 19427099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Acoustic and kinetic behaviour of definity in mice exposed to high frequency ultrasound.
Stapleton S; Goodman H; Zhou YQ; Cherin E; Henkelman RM; Burns PN; Foster FS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 35(2):296-307. PubMed ID: 18950930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ultrasonic backscatter coefficients for weakly scattering, agar spheres in agar phantoms.
King MR; Anderson JJ; Herd MT; Ma D; Haak A; Wirtzfeld LA; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; Oelze ML; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):903-8. PubMed ID: 20707460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A backscatter difference technique for ultrasonic bone assessment.
Hoffmeister BK; Wilson AR; Gilbert MJ; Sellers ME
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):4069-76. PubMed ID: 23231136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Numerical modeling of microbubble backscatter to optimize ultrasound particle image velocimetry imaging: initial studies.
Mukdadi OM; Kim HB; Hertzberg J; Shandas R
Ultrasonics; 2004 Aug; 42(10):1111-21. PubMed ID: 15234173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Backscattering measurement from a single microdroplet.
Lee J; Chang JH; Jeong JS; Lee C; Teh SY; Lee A; Shung KK
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Apr; 58(4):874-9. PubMed ID: 21507767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. High-frequency ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficients of in vivo normal human dermis and subcutaneous fat.
Raju BI; Srinivasan MA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 27(11):1543-56. PubMed ID: 11750754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.
de Jong N; Hoff L; Skotland T; Bom N
Ultrasonics; 1992 Mar; 30(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 1557838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Normalization and backscatter spectral analysis of human carotid arterial data acquired using a clinical linear array ultrasound imaging system.
Sareen M; Waters K; Nair A; Vince DG
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():2968-71. PubMed ID: 19163329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative ultrasound estimates from populations of scatterers with continuous size distributions.
Lavarello R; Oelze M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Apr; 58(4):744-53. PubMed ID: 21507752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Acoustic backscatter properties of the particle/bubble ultrasound contrast agent.
Phillips D; Chen X; Baggs R; Rubens D; Violante M; Parker KJ
Ultrasonics; 1998 Jul; 36(8):883-92. PubMed ID: 9695767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ultrasound-mediated release of hydrophilic and lipophilic agents from echogenic liposomes.
Kopechek JA; Abruzzo TM; Wang B; Chrzanowski SM; Smith DA; Kee PH; Huang S; Collier JH; McPherson DD; Holland CK
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Nov; 27(11):1597-606. PubMed ID: 18946099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
Liu W; Zagzebski JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Polymeric microballoons as ultrasound contrast agents. Physical and ultrasonic properties compared with sonicated albumin.
Schneider M; Bussat P; Barrau MB; Arditi M; Yan F; Hybl E
Invest Radiol; 1992 Feb; 27(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 1376304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Simultaneous backscatter and attenuation estimation using a least squares method with constraints.
Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2096-104. PubMed ID: 21963038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
