165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22088407)
1. Short-term outcomes of the prone perineal approach for extra-levator abdomino-perineal excision (elAPE).
Dalton RS; Smart NJ; Edwards TJ; Chandler I; Daniels IR
Surgeon; 2012 Dec; 10(6):342-6. PubMed ID: 22088407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of conventional versus extended abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
Ortiz H; Ciga MA; Armendariz P; Kreisler E; Codina-Cazador A; Gomez-Barbadillo J; Garcia-Granero E; Roig JV; Biondo S;
Br J Surg; 2014 Jun; 101(7):874-82. PubMed ID: 24817654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perineal or Abdominal Approach First During Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Which Is the Best Strategy?
Kanso F; Maggiori L; Debove C; Chau A; Ferron M; Panis Y
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jul; 58(7):637-44. PubMed ID: 26200677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extralevator Abdominal Perineal Excision Versus Standard Abdominal Perineal Excision: Impact on Quality of the Resected Specimen and Postoperative Morbidity.
Habr-Gama A; São Julião GP; Mattacheo A; de Campos-Lobato LF; Aleman E; Vailati BB; Gama-Rodrigues J; Perez RO
World J Surg; 2017 Aug; 41(8):2160-2167. PubMed ID: 28265736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local control and survival after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for locally advanced or low rectal cancer.
Palmer G; Anderin C; Martling A; Holm T
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Jul; 16(7):527-32. PubMed ID: 24602235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective controlled study of the safety and oncological outcomes of ELAPE procure with definitive anatomic landmarks versus conventional APE for lower rectal cancer.
Shen Z; Ye Y; Zhang X; Xie Q; Yin M; Yang X; Jiang K; Liang B; Wang S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 25659773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic translevator approach to abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: feasibility and short-term oncologic outcomes.
Palter VN; MacLellan S; Ashamalla S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):3001-6. PubMed ID: 26487217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Application of transperineal single-port access assisted extralevator abdominoperineal excision in low rectal cancer].
Shen Z; Ye Y; Jiang K; Xie Q; Yang X; Shen K; Wang S
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 19(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 27003646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extralevator with vs nonextralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: the RELAPe randomized controlled trial.
Bianco F; Romano G; Tsarkov P; Stanojevic G; Shroyer K; Giuratrabocchetta S; Bergamaschi R;
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 19(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 27369739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extralevator abdominoperineal resection in the prone position.
Flor-Lorente B; Frasson M; Montilla E
Cir Esp; 2014 Mar; 92 Suppl 1():30-9. PubMed ID: 24842689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Raftopoulos I; Reed JF; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 21689315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of outcome using a levator sparing technique of abdominoperineal excision of rectum and anus. Cylindrical ELAPE is not necessary in all patients.
Ramsay G; Parnaby C; Mackay C; Hanlon P; Ong S; Loudon M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1219-24. PubMed ID: 23973512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abdominoperineal resection in the prone position: early outcomes at a tertiary institution in the Western Cape, South Africa.
Stevenson N; Lambrechts AVV; Forgan T
S Afr J Surg; 2020 Sep; 58(3):154-159. PubMed ID: 33231009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Perdawood SK; Lund T
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Mar; 19(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 25384360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging of the low rectum: defining the radiological anatomy.
Salerno G; Daniels IR; Brown G
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Sep; 8 Suppl 3():10-3. PubMed ID: 16813585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transperineal minimally invasive abdomino-perineal resection: preliminary outcomes and future perspectives.
Arolfo S; Bullano A; Allaix ME; Arezzo A; Morino M
Updates Surg; 2020 Mar; 72(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 31734881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
Selvindos PB; Ho YH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer--Extensive Surgery to Be Used With Discretion Based on 3-Year Local Recurrence Results: A Registry-based, Observational National Cohort Study.
Prytz M; Angenete E; Bock D; Haglind E
Ann Surg; 2016 Mar; 263(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 25906414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
