BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22088601)

  • 1. Preparing the ground for the 'paperless hospital': a case study of medical records management in a UK outpatient services department.
    Waterson P; Glenn Y; Eason K
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Feb; 81(2):114-29. PubMed ID: 22088601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
    Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research into EPRs: how midwives really feel.
    Jones A; Henwood F; Hart A
    RCM Midwives; 2004 Aug; 7(8):336-9. PubMed ID: 15736897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Paper-based versus computer-based records in the emergency department: staff preferences, expectations, and concerns.
    Ayatollahi H; Bath PA; Goodacre S
    Health Informatics J; 2009 Sep; 15(3):199-211. PubMed ID: 19713395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nursing attitudes and images of electronic patient record systems.
    Dillon TW; Blankenship R; Crews T
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2005; 23(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 15900171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attitudes toward inter-hospital electronic patient record exchange: discrepancies among physicians, medical record staff, and patients.
    Wang JY; Ho HY; Chen JD; Chai S; Tai CJ; Chen YF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Jul; 15():264. PubMed ID: 26162748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Envisioning electronic health record systems as change management: the experience of an English hospital joining the National Programme for Information Technology.
    Takian A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():901-5. PubMed ID: 22874323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of and attitudes to a hospital information system by medical secretaries, nurses and physicians deprived of the paper-based medical record: a case report.
    Laerum H; Karlsen TH; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2004 Oct; 4():18. PubMed ID: 15488150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kaiser Permanente's experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study.
    Scott JT; Rundall TG; Vogt TM; Hsu J
    BMJ; 2005 Dec; 331(7528):1313-6. PubMed ID: 16269467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving quality through effective implementation of information technology in healthcare.
    Øvretveit J; Scott T; Rundall TG; Shortell SM; Brommels M
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2007 Oct; 19(5):259-66. PubMed ID: 17717038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bringing electronic patient records into health professional education: towards an integrative framework.
    Kushniruk AW; Borycki EM; Armstrong B; Joe R; Otto T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():883-7. PubMed ID: 19745439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Undirected health IT implementation in ambulatory care favors paper-based workarounds and limits health data exchange.
    Djalali S; Ursprung N; Rosemann T; Senn O; Tandjung R
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Nov; 84(11):920-32. PubMed ID: 26296433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different usage of the same oncology information system in two hospitals in Sydney--lessons go beyond the initial introduction.
    Yu P; Gandhidasan S; Miller AA
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Jun; 79(6):422-9. PubMed ID: 20371209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A tale of two hospitals: a sociotechnical appraisal of the introduction of computerized physician order entry in two Dutch hospitals.
    Aarts J; Berg M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):999-1002. PubMed ID: 15360962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adoption of electronic medical records as a technology innovation for ambulatory care at the Medical University of South Carolina.
    Lee FW
    Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Aug; 21(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11010366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simply no time? Barriers to GPs' participation in primary health care research.
    Hummers-Pradier E; Scheidt-Nave C; Martin H; Heinemann S; Kochen MM; Himmel W
    Fam Pract; 2008 Apr; 25(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 18417465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. IMASIS computer-based medical record project: dealing with the human factor.
    Martín-Baranera M; Planas I; Palau J; Sanz F
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():333. PubMed ID: 8591191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A case study evaluation of a Critical Care Information System adoption using the socio-technical and fit approach.
    Yusof MM
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Jul; 84(7):486-99. PubMed ID: 25881560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anything but engaged: user involvement in the context of a national electronic health record implementation.
    Cresswell K; Morrison Z; Crowe S; Robertson A; Sheikh A
    Inform Prim Care; 2011; 19(4):191-206. PubMed ID: 22828574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The electronic patient record in primary care--regression or progression? A cross sectional study.
    Hippisley-Cox J; Pringle M; Cater R; Wynn A; Hammersley V; Coupland C; Hapgood R; Horsfield P; Teasdale S; Johnson C
    BMJ; 2003 Jun; 326(7404):1439-43. PubMed ID: 12829558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.