30 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2208866)
1. Continued growth after fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
Holmdahl P; Backteman T; Danielsson A; Kärrholm J; Riad J
J Child Orthop; 2016 Dec; 10(6):643-650. PubMed ID: 27817118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Delayed slipped capital femoral epiphysis after orif for subtrochanteric femur fracture.
Mansi Z; Chamakh M; Atef L; Chermiti W; Ali H; Wael G
Int J Surg Case Rep; 2024 May; 118():109593. PubMed ID: 38598981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the Condition of the Nails in Fractured Limbs.
West J Med Surg; 1842 Jan; 5(1):77. PubMed ID: 38207755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Lateral insertion is a good prognostic factor after in situ fixation in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
Hagiwara S; Nakamura J; Kamegaya M; Saisu T; Kakizaki J; Ohtori S; Kishida S; Takahashi K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Sep; 15():317. PubMed ID: 25260766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of 1-screw and 2-divergent pin internal fixations for treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis, using specimens obtained from immature dogs.
Belkoff SM; Millis DL; Probst CW
Am J Vet Res; 1993 Oct; 54(10):1770-3. PubMed ID: 8250406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analysis of compression screw fixation versus standard in situ pinning in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
Early SD; Hedman TP; Reynolds RA
J Pediatr Orthop; 2001; 21(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 11242247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of in situ single versus double screw fixation in a nonreduced slipped capital femoral epiphysis model.
Segal LS; Jacobson JA; Saunders MM
J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 16791066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical stability of single-screw versus two-screw fixation of an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis model: effect of screw position in the femoral neck.
Kishan S; Upasani V; Mahar A; Oka R; Odell T; Rohmiller M; Newton P; Wenger D
J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(5):601-5. PubMed ID: 16932098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of three internal fixations for treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis in immature dogs.
Belkoff SM; Millis DL; Probst CW
Am J Vet Res; 1992 Nov; 53(11):2136-40. PubMed ID: 1466512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of single- and double-pin fixation for acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
Kruger DM; Herzenberg JE; Viviano DM; Hak DJ; Goldstein SA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Oct; (259):277-81. PubMed ID: 2208866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Problems and complications of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
Canale ST
Instr Course Lect; 1989; 38():281-90. PubMed ID: 2649577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In situ pin fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
Segal LS; Drummond DS; Davidson RS; Robertson WW; Gregg JR
Contemp Orthop; 1991 Jun; 22(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 10149650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
