BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22088686)

  • 1. Re.: Multi-institutional analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar lesions in 446 consecutive cases.
    Taneja SS
    J Urol; 2011 May; 185(5):1638-9. PubMed ID: 22088686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-institutional analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar lesions in 446 consecutive cases.
    Dulabon LM; Kaouk JH; Haber GP; Berkman DS; Rogers CG; Petros F; Bhayani SB; Stifelman MD
    Eur Urol; 2011 Mar; 59(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 21144643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage.
    Libertino JA
    BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(9):1381. PubMed ID: 21992612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage.
    Shikanov S
    BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(9):1381. PubMed ID: 21992585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Renal carcinoma: minimally invasive surgery of the small renal mass.
    Pinto PA
    Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(3):335-6. PubMed ID: 19414126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preoperative predictors of surgical approach for partial nephrectomy.
    Raman JD; Smith B; Messer J; Rohner TJ; Harpster LE; Reese CT
    Can J Urol; 2011 Oct; 18(5):5896-902. PubMed ID: 22018152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Zero-ischaemia robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for hilar tumours.
    Abreu AL; Gill IS; Desai MM
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):948-54. PubMed ID: 21917096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy: intraperitoneal, retroperitoneal, single site.
    Bowlin PR; Farhat WA
    Urol Clin North Am; 2015 Feb; 42(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 25455170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current status of robotic partial nephrectomy.
    Van Haute W; Gavazzi A; Dasgupta P
    Curr Opin Urol; 2010 Sep; 20(5):371-4. PubMed ID: 20616740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reply from authors re: Ricardo Brandina, Inderbir S. Gill. Robotic partial nephrectomy: new beginnings. Eur Urol 2010;57:778-9.
    Ficarra V; Benway BM; Bhayani SB; Rogers CG; Porter JR; Guazzoni G; Buffi N; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2010 Jul; 58(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 20427119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel robotic renorrhaphy technique for hilar tumours: 'V' hilar suture (VHS).
    Hillyer S; Spana G; White MA; Autorino R; Laydner H; Khanna R; Stein RJ; Haber GP; Kaouk JH
    BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(10):1572-7. PubMed ID: 22520108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive cytoreductive nephrectomy: a multi-institutional experience.
    Nunez Bragayrac L; Hoffmeyer J; Abbotoy D; Attwood K; Kauffman E; Spiess P; Wagner A; Schwaab T
    World J Urol; 2016 Dec; 34(12):1651-1656. PubMed ID: 27084776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential use of partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity tumors may explain variability in reported utilization rates.
    Lane BR; Golan S; Eggener S; Tobert CM; Kahnoski RJ; Kutikov A; Smaldone M; Whelan CM; Shalhav A; Uzzo RG
    J Urol; 2013 Jun; 189(6):2047-53. PubMed ID: 23313207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy.
    Kaouk JH; Goel RK
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1163-9. PubMed ID: 19185415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for bilateral synchronous kidney tumors: single-institution comparative analysis.
    Hillyer SP; Autorino R; Laydner H; Yang B; Altunrende F; White M; Spana G; Khanna R; Isac W; Hernandez AV; Simmons M; Stein R; Haber GP; Kaouk J
    Urology; 2011 Oct; 78(4):808-12. PubMed ID: 21855967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re: Editorial comment on early discharge after laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy: care pathway evaluation: M. P. Laguna J Urol 2014;192:1639.
    Goonewardene SS; Rowe E
    J Urol; 2015 May; 193(5):1728. PubMed ID: 25656873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic partial nephrectomy: current technique and outcomes.
    Wang L; Lee BR
    Int J Urol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):848-59. PubMed ID: 23635467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Editorial comment on: Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique.
    Fornara P
    Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):522-3. PubMed ID: 17961908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic partial nephrectomy: a comparison to current techniques.
    Patel MN; Menon M; Rogers CG
    Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(1):74-6. PubMed ID: 20123352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for moderately and highly complex renal lesions.
    Simhan J; Smaldone MC; Tsai KJ; Li T; Reyes JM; Canter D; Kutikov A; Chen DY; Greenberg RE; Uzzo RG; Viterbo R
    J Urol; 2012 Jun; 187(6):2000-4. PubMed ID: 22498208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.