845 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22088831)
1. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
Stoop EM; de Haan MC; de Wijkerslooth TR; Bossuyt PM; van Ballegooijen M; Nio CY; van de Vijver MJ; Biermann K; Thomeer M; van Leerdam ME; Fockens P; Stoker J; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E
Lancet Oncol; 2012 Jan; 13(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 22088831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial.
de Wijkerslooth TR; de Haan MC; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Thomeer M; Essink-Bot ML; van Leerdam ME; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Stoker J; Dekker E
Gut; 2012 Nov; 61(11):1552-9. PubMed ID: 22198714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial.
de Wijkerslooth TR; de Haan MC; Stoop EM; Deutekom M; Fockens P; Bossuyt PM; Thomeer M; van Ballegooijen M; Essink-Bot ML; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J
BMC Gastroenterol; 2010 May; 10():47. PubMed ID: 20482825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single CT colonography versus three rounds of faecal immunochemical test for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (SAVE): a randomised controlled trial.
Sali L; Ventura L; Mascalchi M; Falchini M; Mallardi B; Carozzi F; Milani S; Zappa M; Grazzini G; Mantellini P
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 36116454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Community-based screening by colonoscopy or computed tomographic colonography in asymptomatic average-risk subjects.
Scott RG; Edwards JT; Fritschi L; Foster NM; Mendelson RM; Forbes GM
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):1145-51. PubMed ID: 15180739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colorectal Cancer: Cost-effectiveness of Colonoscopy versus CT Colonography Screening with Participation Rates and Costs.
van der Meulen MP; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Goede SL; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J; van Ballegooijen M
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):901-911. PubMed ID: 29485322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing CT colonography and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial within a population-based screening programme.
Regge D; Iussich G; Segnan N; Correale L; Hassan C; Arrigoni A; Asnaghi R; Bestagini P; Bulighin G; Cassinis MC; Ederle A; Ferraris A; Galatola G; Gallo T; Gandini G; Garretti L; Martina MC; Molinar D; Montemezzi S; Morra L; Motton M; Occhipinti P; Pinali L; Soardi GA; Senore C
Gut; 2017 Aug; 66(8):1434-1440. PubMed ID: 27196588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community-based study.
Edwards JT; Mendelson RM; Fritschi L; Foster NM; Wood C; Murray D; Forbes GM
Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 14688402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed decision-making in colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy or CT-colonography.
de Haan MC; de Wijkerslooth TR; Stoop E; Bossuyt P; Fockens P; Thomeer M; Kuipers EJ; Essink-Bot ML; van Leerdam ME; Dekker E; Stoker J
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Jun; 91(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 23399437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer tomography colonography participation and yield in patients under surveillance for 6-9 mm polyps in a population-based screening trial.
Tutein Nolthenius CJ; Boellaard TN; de Haan MC; Nio CY; Thomeer MG; Bipat S; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; van de Vijver MJ; Biermann K; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J
Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2762-70. PubMed ID: 26560732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history.
Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Pooler BD; Hinshaw JL; Barlow D; Jensen D; Reichelderfer M; Cash BD
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jul; 14(8):711-20. PubMed ID: 23746988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia.
Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor AJ; Leung WK; Winter TC; Hinshaw JL; Gopal DV; Reichelderfer M; Hsu RH; Pfau PR
N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(14):1403-12. PubMed ID: 17914041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer.
Regge D; Laudi C; Galatola G; Della Monica P; Bonelli L; Angelelli G; Asnaghi R; Barbaro B; Bartolozzi C; Bielen D; Boni L; Borghi C; Bruzzi P; Cassinis MC; Galia M; Gallo TM; Grasso A; Hassan C; Laghi A; Martina MC; Neri E; Senore C; Simonetti G; Venturini S; Gandini G
JAMA; 2009 Jun; 301(23):2453-61. PubMed ID: 19531785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study).
Sali L; Grazzini G; Carozzi F; Castiglione G; Falchini M; Mallardi B; Mantellini P; Ventura L; Regge D; Zappa M; Mascalchi M; Milani S
Trials; 2013 Mar; 14():74. PubMed ID: 23497601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of two faecal immunochemical tests for the detection of advanced neoplasia at different positivity thresholds: a cross-sectional study of the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening programme.
de Klerk CM; Wieten E; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Bossuyt PM; Spaander MC; Dekker E
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Feb; 4(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 30497962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reasons for participation and nonparticipation in colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial of colonoscopy and CT colonography.
de Wijkerslooth TR; de Haan MC; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Thomeer M; van Leerdam ME; Essink-Bot ML; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Stoker J; Dekker E
Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Dec; 107(12):1777-83. PubMed ID: 23211845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomised comparison of two faecal immunochemical tests in population-based colorectal cancer screening.
Grobbee EJ; van der Vlugt M; van Vuuren AJ; Stroobants AK; Mundt MW; Spijker WJ; Bongers EJC; Kuipers EJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Bossuyt PM; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
Gut; 2017 Nov; 66(11):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 27507905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple rounds of one sample versus two sample faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a population-based study.
Schreuders EH; Grobbee EJ; Nieuwenburg SAV; Kapidzic A; van Roon AHC; van Vuuren AJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spijker WWJ; Izelaar K; Bruno MJ; Kuipers EJ; Spaander MCW
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Aug; 4(8):622-631. PubMed ID: 31196734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.
Graser A; Melzer A; Lindner E; Nagel D; Herrmann K; Stieber P; Schirra J; Mansmann U; Reiser MF; Göke B; Kolligs FT
Gastroenterology; 2013 Apr; 144(4):743-750.e2. PubMed ID: 23415805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the diagnostic yields of technologists and radiologists in an invitational colorectal cancer screening program performed with CT colonography.
de Haan MC; Nio CY; Thomeer M; de Vries AH; Bossuyt PM; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J
Radiology; 2012 Sep; 264(3):771-8. PubMed ID: 22771881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
