90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22088977)
1. Individual doses for women undergoing screening mammography examinations in Poland in 2007.
Fabiszewska E; Jankowska K; Grabska I; Skrzyński W
J Radiol Prot; 2011 Dec; 31(4):467-75. PubMed ID: 22088977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient doses from screen-film and full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening programme.
Hauge IH; Pedersen K; Sanderud A; Hofvind S; Olerud HM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 21335333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survey of mammography practice in Croatia: equipment performance, image quality and dose.
Faj D; Posedel D; Stimac D; Ivezic Z; Kasabasic M; Ivkovic A; Kubelka D; Ilakovac V; Brnic Z; Bjelac OC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 18940818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammography radiation dose: initial results from Serbia based on mean glandular dose assessment for phantoms and patients.
Ciraj-Bjelac O; Beciric S; Arandjic D; Kosutic D; Kovacevic M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20159918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glandularity and mean glandular dose determined for individual women at four regional breast cancer screening units in the Netherlands.
Zoetelief J; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; Jansen JT
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(7):1807-17. PubMed ID: 16552106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality and dose in mammography in 17 countries in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe: results from IAEA projects.
Ciraj-Bjelac O; Avramova-Cholakova S; Beganovic A; Economides S; Faj D; Gershan V; Grupetta E; Kharita MH; Milakovic M; Milu C; Muhogora WE; Muthuvelu P; Oola S; Setayeshi S; Schandorf C; Ursulean I; Videnovic IR; Zaman A; Ziliukas J; Rehani MM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2161-8. PubMed ID: 21665395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of breast dose in five screening mammography centres in Greece.
Tsapaki V; Tsalafoutas IA; Poga V; Louizi A; Kottou S; Koulentianos E
J Radiol Prot; 2008 Sep; 28(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 18714130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Assessment of mammographic units in Poland in the view of current requirements of radiation protection regulations].
Bekas M; Pachocki KA; Rózycki Z; Wieprzowski K; Fabiszewska E
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2006; 57(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 16900867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - Clinical results.
Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Marten K; Kehbel S; Fischer U; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 12063597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimisation of X-ray examinations in Lithuania: start of implementation in mammography.
Adliene D; Adlys G; Cerapaite R; Jonaitiene E; Cibulskaite I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15933145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards a proposition of a diagnostic (dose) reference level for mammographic acquisitions in breast screening measurements in Belgium.
Smans K; Bosmans H; Xiao M; Carton AK; Marchal G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):321-6. PubMed ID: 16464839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the population dose to the UK population from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme.
Faulkner K; Wallis MG; Neilson F; Whitaker CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):184-90. PubMed ID: 18483008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammography equipment performance, image quality and mean glandular dose in Malta.
Borg M; Badr I; Royle GJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):168-83. PubMed ID: 23525916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 2001 and 2002.
Young KC; Burch A; Oduko JM
Br J Radiol; 2005 Mar; 78(927):207-18. PubMed ID: 15730985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit.
Hemdal B; Herrnsdorf L; Andersson I; Bengtsson G; Heddson B; Olsson M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):436-43. PubMed ID: 15933152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
