These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22089401)

  • 1. Development of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties evaluation.
    Wei X; Zhu X; Bai Y; Wu D; Chen J; Wang C; Chen Z; Yang C; Li J; Li M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(17):1497-504. PubMed ID: 22089401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Korean Version of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire-Scoliosis.
    Bae SH; Son SM; Shin WC; Goh TS; Lee JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(10):E582-E586. PubMed ID: 31770342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the Korean version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire.
    Lee JS; Shin JK; Goh TS; Son SM; An SJ
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2017 Nov; 30(6):1203-1208. PubMed ID: 28655125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A validation study on the traditional Chinese version of Spinal Appearance Questionnaire for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Guo J; Lau AH; Chau J; Ng BK; Lee KM; Qiu Y; Cheng JC; Lam TP
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Oct; 25(10):3186-3193. PubMed ID: 27167743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of reliability and validity of the adapted Persian version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.
    Babaee T; Moradi V; Rouhani N; Shariat A; Parent-Nichols J; Safarnejad H; Nakhaee M
    Spine Deform; 2022 Mar; 10(2):317-326. PubMed ID: 34533776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of the adapted Turkish version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire.
    Yapar A; Yapar D; Ergisi Y; Kaptan AY; Tokgoz MA; Senkoylu A
    Spine Deform; 2021 Jan; 9(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 32808197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re-evaluation of reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of SRS-22 patient questionnaire: a multicenter study of 333 cases.
    Qiu G; Qiu Y; Zhu Z; Liu Z; Song Y; Hai Y; Luo Z; Liu Z; Zhang H; Lv G; Wang Y; Zhang J; Shen J; Sun X
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(8):E545-50. PubMed ID: 21217442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire-Scoliosis.
    Bao H; Yan P; Lonner B; Qiu Y; Ren Y; Zhu Z; Liu Z; Zhu F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Nov; 40(21):E1155-60. PubMed ID: 26502102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity and reliability of an adapted Thai version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Sathira-Angkura V; Pithankuakul K; Sakulpipatana S; Piyaskulkaew C; Kunakornsawat S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(9):783-7. PubMed ID: 22517481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Dutch version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: patient-based cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties evaluation.
    van de Fliert DG; Schlösser TPC; Kempen DHR; Rutges JPHJ; Bisseling P; de Kleuver M; van Hooff ML
    Spine Deform; 2024 Jan; 12(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 37563437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the simplified chinese version of the functional rating index for patients with low back pain.
    Wei X; Chen Z; Bai Y; Zhu X; Wu D; Liu X; Yi H; Chen Z; Wang C; Zhao Y; Yang C; Li J; Li M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(18):1602-8. PubMed ID: 22426448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Greek version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Oikonomaki M; Kelalis G; Skouras AZ; Sotiropoulos S; Georgoudis G; Grivas T
    Spine Deform; 2024 Nov; 12(6):1623-1629. PubMed ID: 38833190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spinal appearance questionnaire: factor analysis, scoring, reliability, and validity testing.
    Carreon LY; Sanders JO; Polly DW; Sucato DJ; Parent S; Roy-Beaudry M; Hopkins J; McClung A; Bratcher KR; Diamond BE;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(18):E1240-4. PubMed ID: 21343853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
    Sanders JO; Harrast JJ; Kuklo TR; Polly DW; Bridwell KH; Diab M; Dormans JP; Drummond DS; Emans JB; Johnston CE; Lenke LG; McCarthy RE; Newton PO; Richards BS; Sucato DJ;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(24):2719-22. PubMed ID: 18007251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adapted simplified Chinese (mainland) version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire.
    Li M; Wang CF; Gu SX; He SS; Zhu XD; Zhao YC; Zhang JT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1321-4. PubMed ID: 19455008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chinese Adaptation of the Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire for Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Under Brace Treatment.
    Xu X; Wang F; Yang M; Huang Q; Chang Y; Wei X; Bai Y; Li M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Aug; 94(31):e1236. PubMed ID: 26252283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and validity of a cross-culturally adapted Hindi version of the SRS-22r questionnaire in Indian patients.
    Garg B; Mehta N; Swamy AM; Kumar S; Dixit V; Gupta V
    Spine Deform; 2020 Oct; 8(5):885-891. PubMed ID: 32253737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the spinal appearance questionnaire for congenital scoliosis patients over 10 years old.
    Fanid MA; Yapar D; Yapar A; Daldal İ; Çetinkaya M; Şenköylü A
    Spine Deform; 2021 Nov; 9(6):1625-1632. PubMed ID: 33948921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) and the Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS).
    Thielsch MT; Wetterkamp M; Boertz P; Gosheger G; Schulte TL
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 13(1):274. PubMed ID: 30376891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ) 2.0 with its assessment in clinical setting.
    Yin M; Sun Z; Ding X; Wang T; Sun Y; Li L; Gao X; Ma J; Huang Q; Xiao J; Mo W
    Spine J; 2022 Dec; 22(12):2024-2032. PubMed ID: 36031097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.