These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22089509)

  • 1. Equating of multi-facet tests across administrations.
    Lunz M; Suanthong S
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 22089509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of performance examinations: revisited.
    Lunz ME; Linacre JM
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 20693701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
    Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):409-34. PubMed ID: 12077465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validating standard setting with a modified nedelsky procedure through common item test equating.
    Smith RM; Gross LJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 9661719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Equating designs and procedures used in Rasch scaling.
    Skaggs G; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(2):182-95. PubMed ID: 20693702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.
    Bandaranayake RC
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(9-10):836-45. PubMed ID: 19117221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construct validity of scores/measures from a developmental assessment in mathematics using classical and many-facet Rasch measurement.
    Banerji M
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):177-98. PubMed ID: 12029177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Item response theory test equating in health sciences education.
    Guilera G; Gómez J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16847729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing screening approaches to investigate stability of common items in Rasch equating.
    Arce-Ferrer AJ
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 18180550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of proficiency in an anesthesiology course across distinct medical student cohorts: psychometric approaches to test equating.
    Liao SW; Chang KY; Ting CK; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang WK
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 77(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 24290232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practical considerations in equating progress tests.
    Langer MM; Swanson DB
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(6):509-12. PubMed ID: 20515383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing concurrent versus fixed parameter equating with common items: using the dichotomous and partial credit models in a mixed-item format test.
    Taherbhai HM; Seo DY
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 17215567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative analysis of the ratings in performance assessment using generalizability theory and the many-facet Rasch model.
    Kim SC; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):408-23. PubMed ID: 19934528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation of factors affecting test equating in latent trait theory.
    Suanthong S; Schumacker RE; Beyerlein MM
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 12023556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing holistic and analytic scoring for performance assessment with many-facet Rasch model.
    Chi E
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 12011505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing examinations that use equal raw scores for cut scores.
    Swanlund A; Smith E
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(4):432-42. PubMed ID: 21164230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rasch techniques for detecting bias in performance assessments: an example comparing the performance of native and non-native speakers on a test of academic English.
    Elder C; McNamara T; Congdon P
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 12748409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Performance assessment using the Many-Facet Rasch Measurement].
    Prieto Adánez G
    Psicothema; 2011 Apr; 23(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 21504675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.