270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22089950)
1. Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000-2011.
Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Thrumurthy S; Low DE
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):1055-63. PubMed ID: 22089950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality.
Funk LM; Gawande AA; Semel ME; Lipsitz SR; Berry WR; Zinner MJ; Jha AK
Ann Surg; 2011 May; 253(5):912-7. PubMed ID: 21422913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospital esophageal cancer resection volume does not predict patient mortality risk.
Kozower BD; Stukenborg GJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 May; 93(5):1690-6; discussion 1696-8. PubMed ID: 22541199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.
Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; McCarter MD; Phillips JD; DeCamp MM; Sherman KL; Ko CY; Bentrem DJ
Arch Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(11):1009-16. PubMed ID: 23165615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic review and pooled analysis assessing the association between elderly age and outcome following surgical resection of esophageal malignancy.
Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Thrumurthy S; Ho A; Muallem G; Low DE
Dis Esophagus; 2013 Apr; 26(3):250-62. PubMed ID: 22591068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of short-term clinical outcomes following salvage esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal malignancy: systematic review and pooled analysis.
Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Penna M; Low DE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):922-31. PubMed ID: 24212722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.
Jafari MD; Halabi WJ; Smith BR; Nguyen VQ; Phelan MJ; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT
Ann Surg; 2013 Sep; 258(3):450-8. PubMed ID: 24022437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is It Time to Centralize High-risk Cancer Care in the United States? Comparison of Outcomes of Esophagectomy Between England and the United States.
Munasinghe A; Markar SR; Mamidanna R; Darzi AW; Faiz OD; Hanna GB; Low DE
Ann Surg; 2015 Jul; 262(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 24979602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Surgeon Volume-outcome Relationship: Not Yet Ready for Policy.
Modrall JG; Minter RM; Minhajuddin A; Eslava-Schmalbach J; Joshi GP; Patel S; Rosero EB
Ann Surg; 2018 May; 267(5):863-867. PubMed ID: 28628561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Spontaneous Centralization in the US Contributed to Reduce Mortality Without Causing Health Disparities.
Schlottmann F; Strassle PD; Charles AG; Patti MG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 29349529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do the 2018 Leapfrog Group Minimal Hospital and Surgeon Volume Thresholds for Esophagectomy Favor Specific Patient Demographics?
Clark JM; Cooke DT; Hashimi H; Chin D; Utter GH; Brown LM; Nuño M
Ann Surg; 2021 Sep; 274(3):e220-e229. PubMed ID: 31425294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Esophagectomy for cancer: clinical concerns support centralizing operations within the larger hospitals.
Fujita H; Ozawa S; Kuwano H; Ueda Y; Hattori S; Yanagawa T;
Dis Esophagus; 2010 Feb; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 19515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of hospital volume on clinical and economic outcomes for esophagectomy.
Kuo EY; Chang Y; Wright CD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Oct; 72(4):1118-24. PubMed ID: 11603422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome of low-volume surgery for esophageal cancer in a high-volume referral center.
Courrech Staal EF; van Coevorden F; Cats A; Aleman BM; van Velthuysen ML; Boot H; Peeters MJ; van Sandick JW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Dec; 16(12):3219-26. PubMed ID: 19777184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-volume versus low-volume for esophageal resections for cancer: the essential role of case-mix adjustments based on clinical data.
Wouters MW; Wijnhoven BP; Karim-Kos HE; Blaauwgeers HG; Stassen LP; Steup WH; Tilanus HW; Tollenaar RA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 18004627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How radical should surgery be for early esophageal cancer?
Bogoevski D; Bockhorn M; Koenig A; Reeh M; von Loga K; Sauter G; Rösch T; Izbicki JR
World J Surg; 2011 Jun; 35(6):1311-20. PubMed ID: 21452070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based selective application of transhiatal esophagectomy in a high-volume esophageal center.
Donohoe CL; O'Farrell NJ; Ravi N; Reynolds JV
World J Surg; 2012 Jan; 36(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 21979584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospital and surgeon volume in relation to survival after esophageal cancer surgery in a population-based study.
Derogar M; Sadr-Azodi O; Johar A; Lagergren P; Lagergren J
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(5):551-7. PubMed ID: 23295792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on clinical outcome following bariatric surgery.
Markar SR; Penna M; Karthikesalingam A; Hashemi M
Obes Surg; 2012 Jul; 22(7):1126-34. PubMed ID: 22527591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of Complex Gastrointestinal Cancer Resection at US News & World Report Top-Ranked vs Non-Ranked Hospitals.
Tay E; Gambhir S; Stopenski S; Hohmann S; Smith BR; Daly S; Hinojosa MW; Nguyen NT
J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Jul; 233(1):21-27.e1. PubMed ID: 33752982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
