These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22090187)
21. Simultaneity and sequence in the perception of apparent motion. Gilroy LA; Hock HS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1563-75. PubMed ID: 19801616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Observer's control of the moving stimulus increases the flash-lag effect. Scocchia L; Grosso RA; de'Sperati C; Stucchi N; Baud-Bovy G Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(19):2363-70. PubMed ID: 19596025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of motion smoothness on the flash-lag illusion. Rizk JK; Chappell M; Hine TJ Vision Res; 2009 Aug; 49(17):2201-8. PubMed ID: 19531367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cast shadow can modulate the judged final position of a moving target. Taya S; Miura K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1930-7. PubMed ID: 20952789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spatial facilitation is involved in flash-lag effect. Maiche A; Budelli R; Gómez-Sena L Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(12):1655-61. PubMed ID: 17445857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simple differential latencies modulate, but do not cause the flash-lag effect. Arnold DH; Ong Y; Roseboom W J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19757882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Localizing the onset of moving stimuli by pointing or relative judgment: variations in the size of the Fröhlich effect. Müsseler J; Stork S; Kerzel D Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):611-7. PubMed ID: 18207214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of feature-based attention on the motion aftereffect at remote locations. Boynton GM; Ciaramitaro VM; Arman AC Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):2968-76. PubMed ID: 16698060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Object updating and the flash-lag effect. Moore CM; Enns JT Psychol Sci; 2004 Dec; 15(12):866-71. PubMed ID: 15563333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Illusory temporal order for stimuli at different depth positions. Ichikawa M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):578-93. PubMed ID: 19304648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reduction of the flash-lag effect in terms of active observation. Ichikawa M; Masakura Y Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1032-44. PubMed ID: 20436198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Spatial versus temporal grouping in a modified Ternus display. Wallace JM; Scott-Samuel NE Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(17):2353-66. PubMed ID: 17632201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Manual control of the visual stimulus reduces the flash-lag effect. Ichikawa M; Masakura Y Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2192-203. PubMed ID: 16494918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Visual grouping by motion precedes the relative localization between moving and flashed stimuli. Watanabe K; Watanabe K J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):504-12. PubMed ID: 15161382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The perceived position of a moving object is not the result of position integration. Shen M; Zhou J; Gao T; Liang J; Shui R Vision Res; 2007 Nov; 47(24):3088-95. PubMed ID: 17905405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contributions of visible persistence and perceptual set to the flash-lag effect: focusing on flash onset abolishes the illusion. Gauch A; Kerzel D Vision Res; 2009 Dec; 49(24):2983-91. PubMed ID: 19788896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]