202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22090372)
1. [Stool behaviour and local pain after radical perineal and retroperitoneal prostatectomy].
Mirzapour K; de Geeter P; Löhmer H; Albers P
Aktuelle Urol; 2011 Nov; 42(6):368-73. PubMed ID: 22090372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Albers P; Schäfers S; Löhmer H; de Geeter P
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy.
Janoff DM; Parra RO
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1863-70. PubMed ID: 15879765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Defecation problems following radical perineal prostatectomy. A prospective study].
Kirschner-Hermanns R; Knispel C; Möller M; Willis S; Jakse G
Urologe A; 2003 May; 42(5):677-84. PubMed ID: 12750803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A longitudinal assessment of bowel related symptoms and fecal incontinence following radical perineal prostatectomy.
Dahm P; Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Young MD; Vieweg J; Albala DM; Paulson DF
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2220-4. PubMed ID: 12771754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences among patients undergoing perineal or retropubic radical prostatectomy in pain and perioperative variables: a prospective study.
Paiva CS; Andreoni C; Cunha GP; Khalil W; Ortiz V
BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1219-26. PubMed ID: 19389007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective longitudinal study comparing a radical retropubic prostatectomy and permanent prostate brachytherapy regarding the health-related quality of life for localized prostate cancer.
Hashine K; Kusuhara Y; Miura N; Shirato A; Sumiyoshi Y; Kataoka M
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jul; 38(7):480-5. PubMed ID: 18621847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inguinal hernia after radical perineal prostatectomy: comparison with the retropubic approach.
Matsubara A; Yoneda T; Nakamoto T; Maruyama S; Koda S; Goto K; Teishima J; Shiina H; Igawa M; Usui T
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1152-6. PubMed ID: 18158037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.
Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Dowell JM; Auge BK; Paulson DF; Dahm P
Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 15072893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy gives favourable surgical and functional outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate.
Palisaar JR; Wenske S; Sommerer F; Hinkel A; Noldus J
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 19298408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preservation of fecal continence and bowel function after radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy: a questionnaire-based outcomes study.
Korman HJ; Mulholland TL; Huang R
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2004; 7(3):249-52. PubMed ID: 15249929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence of fecal and urinary incontinence following radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy in a national population.
Bishoff JT; Motley G; Optenberg SA; Stein CR; Moon KA; Browning SM; Sabanegh E; Foley JP; Thompson IM
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 9679897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single center comparison of anastomotic strictures after radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Gillitzer R; Thomas C; Wiesner C; Jones J; Schmidt F; Hampel C; Brenner W; Thüroff JW; Melchior SW
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2):417-22. PubMed ID: 19969328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
Carini M; Masieri L; Minervini A; Lapini A; Serni S
Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17683854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Teichman JM; Reddy PK; Hulbert JC
Urology; 1995 May; 45(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 7538244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.
Boris RS; Kaul SA; Sarle RC; Stricker HJ
Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3566-70. PubMed ID: 17594747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radical perineal prostatectomy: An outdated procedure?
Comploj E; Palermo S; Trenti E; Martini T; Lodde M; Mian C; Mazzoleni G; Pycha A
Int J Surg; 2011; 9(5):400-3. PubMed ID: 21443972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
