437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22091634)
1. Heat, electricity, or transportation? The optimal use of residual and waste biomass in Europe from an environmental perspective.
Steubing B; Zah R; Ludwig C
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 22091634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels.
McKechnie J; Colombo S; Chen J; Mabee W; MacLean HL
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(2):789-95. PubMed ID: 21142063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Land-use and alternative bioenergy pathways for waste biomass.
Campbell JE; Block E
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(22):8665-9. PubMed ID: 20883033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fuel-mix, fuel efficiency, and transport demand affect prospects for biofuels in northern Europe.
Bright RM; Strømman AH
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2261-9. PubMed ID: 20163088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Life cycle assessment of biohydrogen production as a transportation fuel in Germany.
Wulf C; Kaltschmitt M
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Dec; 150():466-75. PubMed ID: 24050848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Energetic valorization of wood waste: estimation of the reduction in CO2 emissions.
Vanneste J; Van Gerven T; Vander Putten E; Van der Bruggen B; Helsen L
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(19):3595-602. PubMed ID: 21719072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Energy and emission benefits of alternative transportation liquid fuels derived from switchgrass: a fuel life cycle assessment.
Wu M; Wu Y; Wang M
Biotechnol Prog; 2006; 22(4):1012-24. PubMed ID: 16889378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of construction and demolition (C&D) derived biomass and U.S. northeast forest residuals gasification for electricity production.
Nuss P; Gardner KH; Jambeck JR
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Apr; 47(7):3463-71. PubMed ID: 23496419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility study of a Great Lakes bioenergy system.
Hacatoglu K; McLellan PJ; Layzell DB
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):1087-94. PubMed ID: 20833541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of pipeline versus truck transport of bio-oil.
Pootakham T; Kumar A
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jan; 101(1):414-21. PubMed ID: 19699637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Solar energy to biofuels.
Agrawal R; Singh NR
Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2010; 1():343-64. PubMed ID: 22432585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges.
Cherubini F; Strømman AH
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):437-51. PubMed ID: 20832298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coal and biomass to fuels and power.
Williams RH; Liu G; Kreutz TG; Larson ED
Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2011; 2():529-53. PubMed ID: 22432630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Key issues in life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and perspectives.
Singh A; Pant D; Korres NE; Nizami AS; Prasad S; Murphy JD
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jul; 101(13):5003-12. PubMed ID: 20015644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring the production of bio-energy from wood biomass. Italian case study.
González-García S; Bacenetti J
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 647():158-168. PubMed ID: 30077846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The climate impacts of bioenergy systems depend on market and regulatory policy contexts.
Lemoine DM; Plevin RJ; Cohn AS; Jones AD; Brandt AR; Vergara SE; Kammen DM
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Oct; 44(19):7347-50. PubMed ID: 20873876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels.
MacLean HL; Lave LB; Lankey R; Joshi S
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Oct; 50(10):1769-79. PubMed ID: 11288305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The potential of bio-methane as bio-fuel/bio-energy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a qualitative assessment for Europe in a life cycle perspective.
Tilche A; Galatola M
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1683-92. PubMed ID: 18547917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying energy and carbon footprint optimization potentials of a sludge treatment line with Life Cycle Assessment.
Remy C; Lesjean B; Waschnewski J
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 23128622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of regional bioenergy recovery by local methane fermentation thermal recycling systems.
Wong LF; Fujita T; Xu K
Waste Manag; 2008 Nov; 28(11):2259-70. PubMed ID: 18166448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
