These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22092375)

  • 41. Effect of field-of-view size on gray values derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with the Hounsfield unit values from multidetector computed tomography scans.
    Shokri A; Ramezani L; Bidgoli M; Akbarzadeh M; Ghazikhanlu-Sani K; Fallahi-Sichani H
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2018 Mar; 48(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 29581947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Image quality of two different mobile cone beam computed tomographs for maxillofacial surgery.
    Seeberger R; Buchgeister M; Seethaler AC; Shiozawa T; Hoffmann J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):731-4. PubMed ID: 22361302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma.
    Tschauner S; Marterer R; Nagy E; Singer G; Riccabona M; Sorantin E
    Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Dec; 49(12):1939-1949. PubMed ID: 32535775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Internal or in-scan validation: a method to assess CBCT and MSCT gray scales using a human cadaver.
    Bujtár P; Simonovics J; Zombori G; Fejer Z; Szucs A; Bojtos A; Batista WO; Váradi K; Sándor GK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Jun; 117(6):768-79. PubMed ID: 24842449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Surface radiation dose comparison of a dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) machine in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms.
    Tschauner S; Marterer R; Nagy E; Apfaltrer G; Riccabona M; Singer G; Stücklschweiger G; Guss H; Sorantin E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178747. PubMed ID: 28570626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography.
    Katsumata A; Hirukawa A; Okumura S; Naitoh M; Fujishita M; Ariji E; Langlais RP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Dec; 104(6):829-36. PubMed ID: 17448704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Accuracy assessment of prototypes produced using multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Primo BT; Presotto AC; de Oliveira HW; Gassen HT; Miguens SA; Silva AN; Hernandez PA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 41(10):1291-5. PubMed ID: 22578568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions.
    Al-Ekrish AA; Ekram M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 21239568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accuracy of linear intraoral measurements using cone beam CT and multidetector CT: a tale of two CTs.
    Patcas R; Markic G; Müller L; Ullrich O; Peltomäki T; Kellenberger CJ; Karlo CA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Dec; 41(8):637-44. PubMed ID: 22554987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of computed tomographic scanner parameters and 3-dimensional volume rendering techniques on the accuracy of linear, angular, and volumetric measurements of the mandible.
    Whyms BJ; Vorperian HK; Gentry LR; Schimek EM; Bersu ET; Chung MK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 May; 115(5):682-91. PubMed ID: 23601224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Morphometric analysis - Cone beam computed tomography to predict bone quality and quantity.
    Hohlweg-Majert B; Metzger MC; Kummer T; Schulze D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 39(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 21030266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Do image modality and registration method influence the accuracy of craniofacial navigation?
    Widmann G; Zangerl A; Schullian P; Fasser M; Puelacher W; Bale R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22079059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. 3D cone-beam CT with a twin robotic x-ray system in elbow imaging: comparison of image quality to high-resolution multidetector CT.
    Grunz JP; Weng AM; Kunz AS; Veyhl-Wichmann M; Schmitt R; Gietzen CH; Pennig L; Herz S; Ergün S; Bley TA; Gassenmaier T
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2020 Sep; 4(1):52. PubMed ID: 32895778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of physical quality assurance between Scanora 3D and 3D Accuitomo 80 dental CT scanners.
    Ali AS; Fteita D; Kulmala J
    Libyan J Med; 2015; 10(1):28038. PubMed ID: 26091832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison between cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography in diagnostic accuracy of maxillofacial fractures in dried human skull: an in vitro study.
    Eskandarlou A; Poorolajal J; Talaeipour AR; Talebi S; Talaeipour M
    Dent Traumatol; 2014 Apr; 30(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 23826823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effect of calibration and detector temperature on the reconstructed cone beam computed tomography image quality: a study for the workflow of the iCAT Classic equipment.
    Plachtovics M; Goczan J; Nagy K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Apr; 119(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 25687195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view.
    Lofthag-Hansen S; Thilander-Klang A; Gröndahl K
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 20965675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. How accurate is CBCT in measuring bone density? A comparative CBCT-CT in vitro study.
    Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Pacifici A; Pacifici L; Barbato E
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):471-8. PubMed ID: 23294461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Linear accuracy and reliability of volume data sets acquired by two CBCT-devices and an MSCT using virtual models: a comparative in-vitro study.
    Wikner J; Hanken H; Eulenburg C; Heiland M; Gröbe A; Assaf AT; Riecke B; Friedrich RE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 25936361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of different methods to assess alveolar cleft defects in cone beam CT images.
    de Rezende Barbosa GL; Wood JS; Pimenta LA; Maria de Almeida S; Tyndall DA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(2):20150332. PubMed ID: 26648387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.