These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

625 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22092518)

  • 1. Damping behavior of implant-supported restorations.
    Magne P; Silva M; Oderich E; Boff LL; Enciso R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Feb; 24(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 22092518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of adhesively restored custom implant zirconia abutments.
    Oderich E; Boff LL; Cardoso AC; Magne P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Dec; 23(12):1360-8. PubMed ID: 22117899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of CAD/CAM composite resin implant abutments restored with type III composite resin and porcelain veneers.
    Magne P; Oderich E; Boff LL; Cardoso AC; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1275-81. PubMed ID: 21985284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of adhesively restored custom metal-composite resin premolar implant abutments.
    Boff LL; Oderich E; Cardoso AC; Magne P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):364-73. PubMed ID: 24683562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of novel-design anterior single-tooth implant restorations: influence of material selection for type III veneers bonded to zirconia abutments.
    Magne P; Paranhos MP; Burnett LH; Magne M; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Feb; 22(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 21044162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro performance and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated implant supported molar crowns.
    Rosentritt M; Hahnel S; Engelhardt F; Behr M; Preis V
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1213-1219. PubMed ID: 27370027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and veneered zirconia crowns as a posterior implant restoration.
    Kim JH; Lee SJ; Park JS; Ryu JJ
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23296031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns.
    de Kok P; Kleverlaan CJ; de Jager N; Kuijs R; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 25819357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    Sghaireen MG
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
    Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
    Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
    Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars.
    Magne P; Knezevic A
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Feb; 40(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 19169444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.