These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22092587)

  • 1. Biomechanical evaluation of a microstructured zirconia implant by a removal torque comparison with a standard Ti-SLA implant.
    Bormann KH; Gellrich NC; Kniha H; Dard M; Wieland M; Gahlert M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1210-6. PubMed ID: 22092587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Buser D; Nydegger T; Hirt HP; Cochran DL; Nolte LP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 9796144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae.
    Gahlert M; Roehling S; Sprecher CM; Kniha H; Milz S; Bormann K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 21806681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
    Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of osseointegration of fusion-sputtered zirconia implants.
    Salem NA; Abo Taleb AL; Aboushelib MN
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23107438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
    Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
    He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig.
    Gottlow J; Dard M; Kjellson F; Obrecht M; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 20586785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone response to unloaded titanium implants in the fibula, iliac crest, and scapula: an animal study in the Yorkshire pig.
    Rohner D; Meng CS; Hutmacher DW; Tsai KT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Aug; 32(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 14505621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces.
    Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical evaluation of a titanium implant surface conditioned by a hydroxide ion solution.
    Stadlinger B; Ferguson SJ; Eckelt U; Mai R; Lode AT; Loukota R; Schlottig F
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 50(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21177005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface.
    Ferguson SJ; Broggini N; Wieland M; de Wild M; Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Cochran DL; Buser D
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Aug; 78(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 16637025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants: a histological and histomorphometrical study in the maxilla of pigs.
    Gahlert M; Röhling S; Wieland M; Sprecher CM; Kniha H; Milz S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1247-53. PubMed ID: 19531104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison study of the osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants. A biomechanical evaluation in the maxilla of pigs.
    Gahlert M; Röhling S; Wieland M; Eichhorn S; Küchenhoff H; Kniha H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 12(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 19438936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.
    Lee JT; Cho SA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
    Gottlow J; Barkarmo S; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e204-12. PubMed ID: 22487460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Removal torque and histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic grit-blasted/acid-etched and dual acid-etched implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
    Marin C; Granato R; Suzuki M; Gil JN; Piattelli A; Coelho PG
    J Periodontol; 2008 Oct; 79(10):1942-9. PubMed ID: 18834250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluations of bone tissue integration to pure and alloyed titanium implants.
    Stenport VF; Johansson CB
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Sep; 10(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 18241219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a novel calcium phosphate-coated titanium porous oxide implant surface: a study in rabbits.
    Poulos NM; Rodriguez NA; Lee J; Rueggeberg FA; Schüpbach P; Hall J; Susin C; Wikesjö UM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):731-8. PubMed ID: 21841981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.