These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22092731)

  • 1. Compliance with age and skin type restrictions following the introduction of indoor tanning legislation in Melbourne, Australia.
    Makin JK; Hearne K; Dobbinson SJ
    Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2011 Dec; 27(6):286-93. PubMed ID: 22092731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Access to commercial indoor tanning facilities by adults with highly sensitive skin and by under-age youth: compliance tests at solarium centres in Melbourne, Australia.
    Dobbinson S; Wakefield M; Sambell N
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2006 Oct; 15(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 16912571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compliance by California tanning facilities with the nation's first statewide ban on use before the age of 18 years.
    Grewal SK; Haas AF; Pletcher MJ; Resneck JS
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Dec; 69(6):883-889.e4. PubMed ID: 24120564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego.
    Culley CA; Mayer JA; Eckhardt L; Busic AJ; Eichenfield LF; Sallis JF; Quintana PJ; Woodruff SI
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Jan; 44(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11148477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compliance with restrictions on sale of indoor tanning sessions to youth in Minnesota and Massachusetts.
    Forster JL; Lazovich D; Hickle A; Sorensen G; Demierre MF
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 55(6):962-7. PubMed ID: 17097392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compliance with indoor tanning bans for minors among businesses in the USA.
    Choy CC; Cartmel B; Clare RA; Ferrucci LM
    Transl Behav Med; 2017 Dec; 7(4):637-644. PubMed ID: 28593496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of solarium industry efforts to improve compliance with recommended practices: a clear case for formal regulation.
    Paul CL; Girgis A; Anniwell L; Paras L; Lecathelinais C
    Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2009 Aug; 25(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 19614896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Compliance with youth access regulations for indoor UV tanning.
    Hester EJ; Heilig LF; D'Ambrosia R; Drake AL; Schilling LM; Dellavalle RP
    Arch Dermatol; 2005 Aug; 141(8):959-62. PubMed ID: 16103323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing two methods of measuring legislation compliance among indoor tanning facilities.
    Hurd AL; Mayer JA; Woodruff SI; Belch GE; Patel MR
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Mar; 54(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 16488294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Legislation restricting access to indoor tanning throughout the world.
    Pawlak MT; Bui M; Amir M; Burkhardt DL; Chen AK; Dellavalle RP
    Arch Dermatol; 2012 Sep; 148(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 22801924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Solaria compliance in an unregulated environment: the Australian experience.
    Paul CL; Stacey F; Girgis A; Brozek I; Baird H; Hughes J
    Eur J Cancer; 2005 May; 41(8):1178-84. PubMed ID: 15911242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sunbed use in German adults: risk awareness does not correlate with behaviour.
    Schneider S; Zimmermann S; Diehl K; Breitbart EW; Greinert R
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2009; 89(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 19734971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A case for informed consent? Indoor UV tanning facility operator's provision of health risks information (United States).
    Heilig LF; D'Ambrosia R; Drake AL; Dellavalle RP; Hester EJ
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Jun; 16(5):557-60. PubMed ID: 15986110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perspectives in melanoma prevention: the case of sunbeds.
    Autier P
    Eur J Cancer; 2004 Nov; 40(16):2367-76. PubMed ID: 15519507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compliance with indoor tanning advertising regulations in France.
    De Maleissye MF; Fay-Chatelard F; Beauchet A; Saiag P; Mahé E
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Apr; 164(4):880-2. PubMed ID: 21434878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indoor tanning attitudes and practices of US dermatologists compared with other medical specialists.
    Johnson KR; Heilig LF; Hester EJ; Francis SO; Deakyne SJ; Dellavalle RP
    Arch Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 142(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 16618866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indoor tanning use among adolescents in the US, 1998 to 2004.
    Cokkinides V; Weinstock M; Lazovich D; Ward E; Thun M
    Cancer; 2009 Jan; 115(1):190-8. PubMed ID: 19085965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of indoor tanning devices by adults--United States, 2010.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2012 May; 61(18):323-6. PubMed ID: 22572978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Indoor UV tanning operator opinion regarding youth access: an electronic survey.
    Hester EJ; Johnson KR; Crane LA; Schilling LM; Dellavalle RP
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 51(5):814-6. PubMed ID: 15523366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Solaria compliance with the Australia/New Zealand Standard in Adelaide.
    Jones S; Rayner J; Beckmann K
    Health Promot J Austr; 2008 Dec; 19(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 19053940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.