157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22092958)
1. Comparative investigation of the effects of different materials used with a titanium barrier on new bone formation.
Ezirganlı Ş; Polat S; Barış E; Tatar İ; Çelik HH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Mar; 24(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 22092958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of different biomaterials on augmented bone volume resorptions.
Ezirganli S; Kazancioglu HO; Mihmanli A; Sharifov R; Aydin MS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1482-8. PubMed ID: 25264123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of platelet rich fibrin alone used with rigid titanium barrier.
Ozdemir H; Ezirganli S; Isa Kara M; Mihmanli A; Baris E
Arch Oral Biol; 2013 May; 58(5):537-44. PubMed ID: 23141995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone augmentation with autologous periosteal cells and two different calcium phosphate scaffolds under an occlusive titanium barrier: an experimental study in rabbits.
Maréchal M; Eyckmans J; Schrooten J; Schepers E; Luyten FP; van Steenberghe D
J Periodontol; 2008 May; 79(5):896-904. PubMed ID: 18454669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.
Cordaro L; Bosshardt DD; Palattella P; Rao W; Serino G; Chiapasco M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 18705811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparisons between Bio-Oss(®) and Straumann(®) Bone Ceramic in immediate and staged implant placement in dogs mandible bone defects.
Antunes AA; Oliveira Neto P; de Santis E; Caneva M; Botticelli D; Salata LA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 22168758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone tissue modelling and remodelling following guided bone regeneration in combination with biphasic calcium phosphate materials presenting different microporosity.
Dahlin C; Obrecht M; Dard M; Donos N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jul; 26(7):814-22. PubMed ID: 24593049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of two barrier membranes on staged guided bone regeneration and osseointegration of titanium implants in dogs. Part 2: augmentation using bone graft substitutes.
Mihatovic I; Becker J; Golubovic V; Hegewald A; Schwarz F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 21919971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation: clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation.
Proussaefs P; Lozada J
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):237-47. PubMed ID: 17069168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 associated with a variety of bone substitutes on vertical guided bone regeneration in rabbit calvarium.
Polo CI; Lima JL; De Lucca L; Piacezzi CB; Naclério-Homem Mda G; Arana-Chavez VE; Sendyk WR
J Periodontol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 22524330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of solely applied platelet-rich plasma on osseous regeneration compared to Bio-Oss: a morphometric and densitometric study on rabbit calvaria.
Torres J; Tamimi FM; Tresguerres IF; Alkhraisat MH; Khraisat A; Lopez-Cabarcos E; Blanco L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 18462207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of two barrier membranes on staged guided bone regeneration and osseointegration of titanium implants in dogs: part 1. Augmentation using bone graft substitutes and autogenous bone.
Schwarz F; Mihatovic I; Golubovic V; Hegewald A; Becker J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 21518008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guided bone generation in a rabbit mandible model after periosteal expansion with an osmotic tissue expander.
Abrahamsson P; Isaksson S; Andersson G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1282-8. PubMed ID: 21985285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vertical bone augmentation using a polytetrafluoroethylene nonporous barrier for osseointegrated implants partially inserted in tibiae of rabbits.
de Macedo NL; do Socorro Ferreira Monteiro A; de Macedo LG
Implant Dent; 2009 Apr; 18(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 19359869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of ErhBMP-2-/EGCG-coated BCP bone substitute on dehiscence around dental implants in dogs.
Shin YS; Seo JY; Oh SH; Kim JH; Kim ST; Park YB; Moon HS
Oral Dis; 2014 Apr; 20(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 23651333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oral implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Oss, Ostim-Paste or PerioGlas: an experimental study in the rabbit tibiae.
Carmagnola D; Abati S; Celestino S; Chiapasco M; Bosshardt D; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1246-53. PubMed ID: 19040439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study.
Mangano C; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 18271380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of platelet-rich plasma in combination with anorganic bovine bone in the rabbit cranium: a pilot study.
Aghaloo TL; Moy PK; Freymiller EG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 14982356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced bone regeneration with a novel synthetic bone substitute in combination with a new natural cross-linked collagen membrane: radiographic and histomorphometric study.
Calvo-Guirado JL; Ramírez-Fernández MP; Maté-Sánchez JE; Bruno N; Velasquez P; de Aza PN
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Apr; 26(4):454-464. PubMed ID: 24720519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration.
Artas G; Gul M; Acikan I; Kirtay M; Bozoglan A; Simsek S; Yaman F; Dundar S
Braz Oral Res; 2018 Jul; 32():e59. PubMed ID: 29995064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
