These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
854 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22093014)
1. Experimental evidence for interfacial biochemical bonding in osseointegrated titanium implants. Sul YT; Kwon DH; Kang BS; Oh SJ; Johansson C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():8-19. PubMed ID: 22093014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants. Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Importance of Ca(2+) modifications for osseointegration of smooth and moderately rough anodized titanium implants - a removal torque and histological evaluation in rabbit. Fröjd V; Wennerberg A; Franke Stenport V Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):737-45. PubMed ID: 20977616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants. Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone. Park JW Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. Sul YT; Kang BS; Johansson C; Um HS; Park CJ; Albrektsson T J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jun; 89(4):942-50. PubMed ID: 18470920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone. Sul YT; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12381062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a novel calcium phosphate-coated titanium porous oxide implant surface: a study in rabbits. Poulos NM; Rodriguez NA; Lee J; Rueggeberg FA; Schüpbach P; Hall J; Susin C; Wikesjö UM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):731-8. PubMed ID: 21841981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model. Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant. He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Ellingsen JE; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Holmén A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhanced implant integration with hierarchically structured implants: a pilot study in rabbits. Johansson CB; Gretzer C; Jimbo R; Mattisson I; Ahlberg E Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):943-53. PubMed ID: 21722190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Titanium Implants after alkali heating treatment with a [Zn(OH)4]2 complex: analysis of interfacial bond strength using push-out tests. Alvarez K; Fukuda M; Yamamoto O Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e114-25. PubMed ID: 20455903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur. Park JW; Kwon TG; Suh JY Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 22409778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Removal torque and histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic grit-blasted/acid-etched and dual acid-etched implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs. Marin C; Granato R; Suzuki M; Gil JN; Piattelli A; Coelho PG J Periodontol; 2008 Oct; 79(10):1942-9. PubMed ID: 18834250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peri-implant bone formation and surface characteristics of rough surface zirconia implants manufactured by powder injection molding technique in rabbit tibiae. Park YS; Chung SH; Shon WJ Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 May; 24(5):586-91. PubMed ID: 22471790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration. Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]