These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22093264)

  • 41. Accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered very low-dose coronary dual-source CT angiography using iterative reconstruction for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: comparison with invasive catheterization.
    Layritz C; Schmid J; Achenbach S; Ulzheimer S; Wuest W; May M; Ropers D; Klinghammer L; Daniel WG; Pflederer T; Lell M
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 15(11):1238-45. PubMed ID: 24939952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Low-dose dual-source CT angiography with iterative reconstruction for coronary artery stent evaluation.
    Eisentopf J; Achenbach S; Ulzheimer S; Layritz C; Wuest W; May M; Lell M; Ropers D; Klinghammer L; Daniel WG; Pflederer T
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Apr; 6(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 23498678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction.
    Renker M; Nance JW; Schoepf UJ; O'Brien TX; Zwerner PL; Meyer M; Kerl JM; Bauer RW; Fink C; Vogl TJ; Henzler T
    Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):390-9. PubMed ID: 21693660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography in patients after bypass grafting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.
    Weustink AC; Nieman K; Pugliese F; Mollet NR; Meijboom WB; van Mieghem C; ten Kate GJ; Cademartiri F; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jul; 2(7):816-24. PubMed ID: 19608130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Quantitative computed tomographic coronary angiography: does it predict functionally significant coronary stenoses?
    Rossi A; Papadopoulou SL; Pugliese F; Russo B; Dharampal AS; Dedic A; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Meijboom WB; van Geuns RJ; Wragg A; Ligthart J; Schultz C; Petersen SE; Nieman K; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 24280729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Additional value of adenosine-stress dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging in the reclassification of severity of coronary artery stenosis at coronary CT angiography.
    Kim SM; Choi JH; Chang SA; Choe YH
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Dec; 68(12):e659-68. PubMed ID: 24034545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Safety and accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in children after the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries.
    Ou P; Celermajer DS; Marini D; Agnoletti G; Vouhé P; Brunelle F; Le Quan Sang KH; Thalabard JC; Sidi D; Bonnet D
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 May; 1(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 19356445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. In vivo assessment of ergonovine-induced coronary artery spasm by 64-slice multislice computed tomography.
    Ito T; Terashima M; Kaneda H; Nasu K; Ehara M; Kinoshita Y; Ito T; Kimura M; Tanaka N; Habara M; Tsuchikane E; Suzuki T
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 5(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 22342944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Features of disrupted plaques by coronary computed tomographic angiography: correlates with invasively proven complex lesions.
    Madder RD; Chinnaiyan KM; Marandici AM; Goldstein JA
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Mar; 4(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 21262981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography for stenosis quantification using quantitative coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound as the gold standard.
    Joshi SB; Okabe T; Roswell RO; Weissman G; Lopez CF; Lindsay J; Pichard AD; Weissman NJ; Waksman R; Weigold WG
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Oct; 104(8):1047-51. PubMed ID: 19801022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Diagnostic performance of algorithm for computer-assisted detection of significant coronary artery disease in patients with acute chest pain: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.
    Min JH; Kim SM; Lee S; Choi JH; Chang SA; Choe YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Apr; 202(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 24660699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Association of serum homocysteine levels with the severity and calcification of coronary atherosclerotic plaques detected by coronary CT angiography.
    Sun Q; Jia X; Gao J; Mou W; Tong H; Wen X; Tian Y
    Int Angiol; 2014 Aug; 33(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 25056163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessment of perioperative cardiac risk of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery using coronary computed tomographic angiography.
    Hwang JW; Kim EK; Yang JH; Chang SA; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Gwon HC; Lee SH; Kim SM; Choe YH; Oh JK; Choi JH
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Quantitative measures of coronary stenosis severity by 64-Slice CT angiography and relation to physiologic significance of perfusion in nonobese patients: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Sato A; Hiroe M; Tamura M; Ohigashi H; Nozato T; Hikita H; Takahashi A; Aonuma K; Isobe M
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Apr; 49(4):564-72. PubMed ID: 18344444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessment of Agatston coronary artery calcium score using contrast-enhanced CT coronary angiography.
    van der Bijl N; Joemai RM; Geleijns J; Bax JJ; Schuijf JD; de Roos A; Kroft LJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1299-305. PubMed ID: 21098187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial.
    Budoff MJ; Dowe D; Jollis JG; Gitter M; Sutherland J; Halamert E; Scherer M; Bellinger R; Martin A; Benton R; Delago A; Min JK
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(21):1724-32. PubMed ID: 19007693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracy of low-dose prospectively gated axial coronary CT angiography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable heart rate.
    Carrascosa P; Capuñay C; Deviggiano A; Goldsmit A; Tajer C; Bettinotti M; Carrascosa J; Ivanc TB; Fallahi A; García MJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2010; 4(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 20444666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography.
    Herzog C; Zwerner PL; Doll JR; Nielsen CD; Nguyen SA; Savino G; Vogl TJ; Costello P; Schoepf UJ
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 17581898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Impact of coronary artery calcium characteristics on accuracy of CT angiography.
    Kruk M; Noll D; Achenbach S; Mintz GS; Pręgowski J; Kaczmarska E; Kryczka K; Pracoń R; Dzielińska Z; Sleszycka J; Witkowski A; Demkow M; Rużyłło W; Kępka C
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 24290567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Coronary CTA: stenosis classification and quantification, including automated measures.
    Bekkers E; Roos J
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3 Suppl 2():S109-15. PubMed ID: 20129518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.