These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22093530)

  • 1. Direct-to-consumer testing: more risks than opportunities.
    Lippi G; Favaloro EJ; Plebani M
    Int J Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 65(12):1221-9. PubMed ID: 22093530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct-to-consumer online genetic testing and the four principles: an analysis of the ethical issues.
    Wasson K; Cook ED; Helzlsouer K
    Ethics Med; 2006; 22(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 17115513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?
    Caulfield T; Ries NM; Ray PN; Shuman C; Wilson B
    Clin Genet; 2010 Feb; 77(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 19968666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical and clinical practice considerations for genetic counselors related to direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests.
    Wade CH; Wilfond BS
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2006 Nov; 142C(4):284-92, discussion 293. PubMed ID: 17068807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical implications of direct-to-consumer genetic testing for cardiovascular disease risk.
    Austin SE; Hegele RA
    Can J Cardiol; 2011; 27(6):682-4. PubMed ID: 21652171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
    Covolo L; Rubinelli S; Ceretti E; Gelatti U
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Dec; 17(12):e279. PubMed ID: 26677835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic gatekeepers: regulating direct-to-consumer genomic services in an era of participatory medicine.
    Palmer JE
    Food Drug Law J; 2012; 67(4):475-524, iii. PubMed ID: 24640618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing kits. You send in a sample and get your results online. But is it worth the price?
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2010 Sep; 18(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20960701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Where there's a web, there's a way: commercial genetic testing and the Internet.
    Williams-Jones B
    Community Genet; 2003; 6(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 12748438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: perceptions, problems, and policy responses.
    Caulfield T; McGuire AL
    Annu Rev Med; 2012; 63():23-33. PubMed ID: 21888511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing--Atlanta, Denver, Raleigh-Durham, and Seattle, 2003.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2004 Jul; 53(27):603-6. PubMed ID: 15254451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physicians' opinion for 'new' genetic testing in Japan.
    Ohata T; Tsuchiya A; Watanabe M; Sumida T; Takada F
    J Hum Genet; 2009 Apr; 54(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 19300458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three Rs potential in the development and quality control of immunobiologicals.
    Halder M
    ALTEX; 2001; 18 Suppl 1():13-47. PubMed ID: 11854853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bioethical and clinical dilemmas of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: the problem of misattributed equivalence.
    Eng C; Sharp RR
    Sci Transl Med; 2010 Feb; 2(17):17cm5. PubMed ID: 20371476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nutrigenomics and ethics interface: direct-to-consumer services and commercial aspects.
    Ries NM; Castle D
    OMICS; 2008 Dec; 12(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 19040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Traditional and innovative diagnostic tools: when and why they should be applied].
    Cancrini G; Iori A
    Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15305711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current landscape of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and its role in ophthalmology: a review.
    Sanfilippo PG; Kearns LS; Wright P; Mackey DA; Hewitt AW
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 43(6):578-90. PubMed ID: 25676199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Policy in Korea Based on Consumer Preference.
    Jeong G
    Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(3):166-173. PubMed ID: 28817817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.