These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22094292)

  • 21. Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types.
    Kohles SS; Clark MB; Brown CA; Kenealy JN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 15346747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study.
    Windisch SI; Jung RE; Sailer I; Studer SP; Ender A; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 17590160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study.
    Klotz MW; Taylor TD; Goldberg AJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):970-5. PubMed ID: 22010078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology.
    Cha BK; Lee JY; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Yoshida N
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 17513876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Volumetric misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a university laboratory study.
    Almasri R; Drago CJ; Siegel SC; Hardigan PC
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 21492296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions.
    Elcock C; Smith RN; Simpson J; Abdellatif A; Bäckman B; Brook AH
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 May; 114 Suppl 1():365-9; discussion 375-6, 382-3. PubMed ID: 16674714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
    Zilberman O; Huggare JA; Parikakis KA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The measurement threshold and limitations of an intra-oral scanner on polished human enamel.
    Charalambous P; O'Toole S; Bull T; Bartlett D; Austin R
    Dent Mater; 2021 Apr; 37(4):648-654. PubMed ID: 33573841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Determination of Bolton tooth-size ratios by digitization, and comparison with the traditional method.
    Paredes V; Gandia JL; Cibrian R
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 16373454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surface roughness of impression materials and dental stones scanned by non-contacting laser profilometry.
    Rodriguez JM; Curtis RV; Bartlett DW
    Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 19036424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Registration using three-dimensional laser surface scanning for navigation in oral and craniomaxillofacial surgery].
    Troitzsch D; Hoffmann J; Dammann F; Bartz D; Reinert S
    Zentralbl Chir; 2003 Jul; 128(7):551-6. PubMed ID: 12884140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of the Bolton tooth-size analysis when applied to crowded dentitions.
    Shellhart WC; Lange DW; Kluemper GT; Hicks EP; Kaplan AL
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):327-34. PubMed ID: 8526291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigation into the validity of WearCompare, a purpose-built software to quantify erosive tooth wear progression.
    O'Toole S; Osnes C; Bartlett D; Keeling A
    Dent Mater; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1408-1414. PubMed ID: 31402133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of the amount of remaining coronal dentine in root-treated teeth.
    Bandlish RB; McDonald AV; Setchell DJ
    J Dent; 2006 Oct; 34(9):699-708. PubMed ID: 16540226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A simple mounting model for consistent determination of the accuracy and repeatability of apex locators.
    ElAyouti A; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 16454790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A novel approach to evaluating the reproducibility of a replication technique for the manufacture of electroconductive replicas for use in quantitative clinical dental wear studies.
    Chadwick RG; Mitchell HL; Ward S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 15089938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.