These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22094825)

  • 61. Comparison of the TEMPO+ ear-level speech processor and the cis pro+ body-worn processor in adult MED-EL cochlear implant users.
    Helms J; Müller J; Schön F; Winkler F; Moser L; Shehata-Dieler W; Kastenbauer E; Baumann U; Rasp G; Schorn K; Ebetaer B; Baumgartner W; Hamzavi S; Gstöttner W; Westhofen M; Döring W; Dujardin H; Albegger K; Mair A; Zenner H; Haferkamp C; Schmitz-Salue C; Arold R; Sesterhenn G; Jahnke V; Wagner H; Gräbel S; Bockmühl U; Häusler R; Vischer M; Kompis M; Hildmann H; Radü H; Stark T; Engel A; Hildmann A; Streitberger C; Hüttenbrink K; Müller-Aschoff E; Hofmann G; Seeling K; Hloucal U; von Ilberg C; Kiefer J; Pfennigdorff T; Gall V; Breitfuss A; Stelzig Y; Begall K; Hey M; Vorwerk W; Thumfart W; Gunkel A; Zorowka P; Stephan K; Gammert C; Mathis A; DeMin N; Freigang B; Ziese M; Stützel A; von Specht H; Arnold W; Brockmeier S; Ebenhoch H; Steinhoff A; Zierhofer C; Zwicknagl M; Stöbich B
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2001; 63(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11174060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Speech and pitch perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy].
    Gu P; Xi X; Han D; Hong M; Wang Q; Yang S; Dai P
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 27(10):481-4. PubMed ID: 23937013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Speech perception and subjective benefit in paediatric C40+ users after the upgrade to fine structure processing (FSP).
    Lorens A; Zgoda M; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():444-8. PubMed ID: 21756670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Speech recognition outcomes in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with fine structure processing.
    Qi B; Liu Z; Gu X; Liu B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 137(3):286-292. PubMed ID: 27701966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Extra benefit of a second cochlear implant with respect to health-related quality of life and tinnitus.
    Olze H; Gräbel S; Haupt H; Förster U; Mazurek B
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Sep; 33(7):1169-75. PubMed ID: 22892805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The impact of etiology and duration of deafness on speech perception outcomes in SSD patients.
    Kurz A; Grubenbecher M; Rak K; Hagen R; Kühn H
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 276(12):3317-3325. PubMed ID: 31535291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Analysis of ceiling effects occurring with speech recognition tests in adult cochlear-implanted patients.
    Helms J; Weichbold V; Baumann U; von Specht H; Schön F; Müller J; Esser B; Ziese M; Anderson I; D'Haese P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2004; 66(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 15316233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (MED-EL Combi-40) compared to the multipeak and spectral peak strategies (nucleus).
    Kiefer J; Müller J; Pfennigdorff T; Schön F; Helms J; von Ilberg C; Baumgartner W; Gstöttner W; Ehrenberger K; Arnold W; Stephan K; Thumfart W; Baur S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1996; 58(3):127-35. PubMed ID: 8797215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Assessment of directionality performances: comparison between Freedom and CP810 sound processors.
    Razza S; Albanese G; Ermoli L; Zaccone M; Cristofari E
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Oct; 149(4):608-13. PubMed ID: 23838307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Benefits from upgrade to the CP810 sound processor for Nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Mosnier I; Marx M; Venail F; Loundon N; Roux-Vaillard S; Sterkers O
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jan; 271(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 23408020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Perception in noise with the Digisonic SP cochlear implant: Clinical trial of Saphyr processor's upgraded signal processing.
    Bergeron F; Hotton M
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2016 Jun; 133 Suppl 1():S4-6. PubMed ID: 27246745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Fine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Galindo J; Lassaletta L; Mora RP; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Gavilán J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 270(4):1223-9. PubMed ID: 22766835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Effects of temporal fine structure stimulation on Mandarin speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Qi B; Krenmayr A; Zhang N; Dong R; Chen X; Schatzer R; Zierhofer C; Liu B; Han D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Nov; 132(11):1183-91. PubMed ID: 23025474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [A multicentre comparative study of the ESPrit and the Nucleus 22].
    Berger K; Bagus H; Michels H; Roth J; Voss B; Klenzner T
    HNO; 2006 May; 54(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 16220284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Design for an inexpensive but effective cochlear implant.
    Wilson BS; Rebscher S; Zeng FG; Shannon RV; Loeb GE; Lawson DT; Zerbi M
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Feb; 118(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 9482558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Performance of compressed analogue (CA) and continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) coding strategies for cochlear implants in quiet and noise.
    Kompis M; Vischer MW; Häusler R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1999; 119(6):659-64. PubMed ID: 10586998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Comparison of the Effects of Two Cochlear Implant Fine Structure Coding Strategies on Speech Perception.
    Müller V; Klünter HD; Fürstenberg D; Walger M; Lang-Roth R
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Jun; 29(2):226-235. PubMed ID: 32464082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Influence of Telecommunication Modality, Internet Transmission Quality, and Accessories on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Mantokoudis G; Koller R; Guignard J; Caversaccio M; Kompis M; Senn P
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Apr; 19(4):e135. PubMed ID: 28438727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Handling of the MED-EL TEMPO+ ear-level speech processor by paediatric cochlear implant users and their parents.
    Anderson I; Schmidt M; Buchreiter T; Bisanar K
    Int J Audiol; 2004; 43(10):579-84. PubMed ID: 15724522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Intra- and intersubject comparison of cochlear implant systems using the Esprit and the Tempo+ behind-the-ear speech processor.
    Kompis M; Jenk M; Vischer MW; Seifert E; Häusler R
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Dec; 41(8):555-62. PubMed ID: 12477176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.