BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22095306)

  • 1. High negative valence does not protect emotional event-related potentials from spatial inattention and perceptual load.
    Wiens S; Molapour T; Overfeld J; Sand A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 12(1):151-60. PubMed ID: 22095306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emotional event-related potentials are larger to figures than scenes but are similarly reduced by inattention.
    Nordström H; Wiens S
    BMC Neurosci; 2012 May; 13():49. PubMed ID: 22607397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing of unattended, simple negative pictures resists perceptual load.
    Sand A; Wiens S
    Neuroreport; 2011 May; 22(7):348-52. PubMed ID: 21464776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of attention manipulations on motivated attention to feared and nonfeared negative distracters in spider fear.
    Norberg J; Wiens S
    BMC Neurosci; 2013 Nov; 14():139. PubMed ID: 24207058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emotional event-related potentials are reduced if negative pictures presented at fixation are unattended.
    Wiens S; Sand A; Norberg J; Andersson P
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 21435375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Directed attention reduces processing of emotional distracters irrespective of valence and arousal level.
    Wiens S; Syrjänen E
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 23669534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonemotional features suppress early and enhance late emotional electrocortical responses to negative pictures.
    Wiens S; Sand A; Olofsson JK
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Jan; 86(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 21093530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of emotional intensity under perceptual load: An event-related potentials (ERPs) study.
    Müller-Bardorff M; Schulz C; Peterburs J; Bruchmann M; Mothes-Lasch M; Miltner W; Straube T
    Biol Psychol; 2016 May; 117():141-149. PubMed ID: 26995785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the effect of respiratory bodily threat on the processing of emotional pictures.
    Juravle G; Stoeckel MC; Rose M; Gamer M; Büchel C; Wieser MJ; von Leupoldt A
    Respir Physiol Neurobiol; 2014 Dec; 204():41-9. PubMed ID: 24874555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Affective prime and target picture processing: an ERP analysis of early and late interference effects.
    Flaisch T; Stockburger J; Schupp HT
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Jun; 20(4):183-91. PubMed ID: 18335309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain dynamics in spider-phobic individuals exposed to phobia-relevant and other emotional stimuli.
    Michalowski JM; Melzig CA; Weike AI; Stockburger J; Schupp HT; Hamm AO
    Emotion; 2009 Jun; 9(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 19485608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brain potentials during affective picture processing in children.
    Hajcak G; Dennis TA
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 19103249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gender moderates valence effects on the late positive potential to emotional distracters.
    Syrjänen E; Wiens S
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Sep; 551():89-93. PubMed ID: 23886486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective visual attention to emotional pictures: Interactions of task-relevance and emotion are restricted to the late positive potential.
    Schindler S; Straube T
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Sep; 57(9):e13585. PubMed ID: 32306463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Slow biasing of processing resources in early visual cortex is preceded by emotional cue extraction in emotion-attention competition.
    Schönwald LI; Müller MM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Apr; 35(4):1477-90. PubMed ID: 23450516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Affective picture processing as a function of preceding picture valence: an ERP analysis.
    Schupp HT; Schmälzle R; Flaisch T; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Sep; 91(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 22564477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive cognitive control attenuates the late positive potential to emotional distractors.
    Flaisch T; Steinhauser M; Schupp HT
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 200():51-58. PubMed ID: 31226493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brain dynamics of visual attention during anticipation and encoding of threat- and safe-cues in spider-phobic individuals.
    Michalowski JM; Pané-Farré CA; Löw A; Hamm AO
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 10(9):1177-86. PubMed ID: 25608985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dynamic allocation of attention to emotion: simultaneous and independent evidence from the late positive potential and steady state visual evoked potentials.
    Hajcak G; MacNamara A; Foti D; Ferri J; Keil A
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Mar; 92(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 22155660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feature-based attention interacts with emotional picture content during mid-latency and late ERP processing stages.
    Schindler S; Bruchmann M; Straube T
    Biol Psychol; 2022 Apr; 170():108310. PubMed ID: 35278527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.