191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22097248)
21. Accelerated ray tracing for radiotherapy dose calculations on a GPU.
de Greef M; Crezee J; van Eijk JC; Pool R; Bel A
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):4095-102. PubMed ID: 19810482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. High performance computing for deformable image registration: towards a new paradigm in adaptive radiotherapy.
Samant SS; Xia J; Muyan-Ozcelik P; Owens JD
Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3546-53. PubMed ID: 18777915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dosimetric evaluation of a Monte Carlo IMRT treatment planning system incorporating the MIMiC.
Rassiah-Szegedi P; Fuss M; Sheikh-Bagheri D; Szegedi M; Stathakis S; Lancaster J; Papanikolaou N; Salter B
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6931-41. PubMed ID: 18029985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [A preliminary study of beam weight optimization of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with genetic algorithm].
Tang MT; Chen CM; Zhou LH; Lü QW; Wang ZY; Chen GJ
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2006 Apr; 26(4):456-8. PubMed ID: 16624751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multi-GPU implementation of a VMAT treatment plan optimization algorithm.
Tian Z; Peng F; Folkerts M; Tan J; Jia X; Jiang SB
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2841-52. PubMed ID: 26127037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Accelerated algorithm of dose calculation for treatment planning system of multi-source stereotactic radiotherapy system with gamma beam].
Cao G
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 36(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 22571144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sub-second pencil beam dose calculation on GPU for adaptive proton therapy.
da Silva J; Ansorge R; Jena R
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(12):4777-95. PubMed ID: 26040956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fast dose calculation in magnetic fields with GPUMCD.
Hissoiny S; Raaijmakers AJ; Ozell B; Després P; Raaymakers BW
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5119-29. PubMed ID: 21775790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fast convolution-superposition dose calculation on graphics hardware.
Hissoiny S; Ozell B; Després P
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 19610288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Genetic algorithm-based dose optimization in intensity modulated radiation therapy].
Zhou LH; Tang MT; Wang ZY; Chen CM; Lü QW; Jin HY
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Jan; 27(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 17259143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimizing an analytical dose calculation algorithm for fast 2D calculations.
Lorenz F; Richter H; Zygmanski P
Z Med Phys; 2010; 20(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 20211425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An efficient framework for photon Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Fix MK; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Mini R; Born EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):N425-37. PubMed ID: 17881793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modelling lateral beam quality variations in pencil kernel based photon dose calculations.
Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(16):4111-8. PubMed ID: 16885628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Aperture superposition dose model versus pencil beam superposition dose model for a finite size Cobalt-60 source for tomotherapy deliveries.
Dhanesar S; Darko J; Schreiner LJ
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):206-13. PubMed ID: 22225289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collapsed cone versus pencil beam.
Koelbl O; Krieger T; Haedinger U; Sauer O; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Dec; 180(12):783-8. PubMed ID: 15592698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
Krieger T; Sauer OA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The automatic optimization arithmetic of selecting beam arcs in X-knife radiotherapy planning system].
Liu YX; Li SX; Lu QW
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 26(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 16104151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
