These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22098881)
1. Mechanical characterization and numerical simulation of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cranial implants. El Halabi F; Rodriguez JF; Rebolledo L; Hurtós E; Doblaré M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Nov; 4(8):1819-32. PubMed ID: 22098881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK. Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the mechanical behaviour of PEEK and HA cranial implants under impact loading. Garcia-Gonzalez D; Jayamohan J; Sotiropoulos SN; Yoon SH; Cook J; Siviour CR; Arias A; Jérusalem A J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 May; 69():342-354. PubMed ID: 28160738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Homogenous scaffold-based cranial/skull implant modelling and structural analysis-unit cell algorithm-meshless approach. Phanindra Bogu V; Ravi Kumar Y; Kumar Khanra A Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Nov; 55(11):2053-2065. PubMed ID: 28474182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Patient-Specific Cranial Implant Design Using Finite Element Analysis. Huys SEF; Van Gysel A; Mommaerts MY; Sloten JV World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():198-204. PubMed ID: 33529765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design of customized implants and 3D printing of symmetric and asymmetric cranial cavities. Singh HN; Agrawal S; Kuthe AM J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106061. PubMed ID: 37544200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thickness-extensible higher order plate theory with enforced C1 continuity for the analysis of PEEK medical implants. Tasneem MHB; Al-Jahwari F; Al-Kindi M; Al-Lawati I; Al Lawati A Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Sep; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 39214121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of PEEK biomaterials using the small punch test. Jaekel DJ; MacDonald DW; Kurtz SM J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 4(7):1275-82. PubMed ID: 21783136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modelling and structural analysis of skull/cranial implant: beyond mid-line deformities. Bogu VP; Kumar YR; Kumar Khanara A Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 28552926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design and manufacture of customized dental implants by using reverse engineering and selective laser melting technology. Chen J; Zhang Z; Chen X; Zhang C; Zhang G; Xu Z J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1088-95.e1. PubMed ID: 24939253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of microstructural inclusions on fatigue life of polyether ether ketone (PEEK). Simsiriwong J; Shrestha R; Shamsaei N; Lugo M; Moser RD J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Nov; 51():388-97. PubMed ID: 26301567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical testing and modelling of the Universal 2 implant. Gislason MK; Foster E; Main D; Fusiek G; Niewczas P; Bransby-Zachary M; Nash DH Med Eng Phys; 2016 Jun; 38(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 27083120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The long-term mechanical integrity of non-reinforced PEEK-OPTIMA polymer for demanding spinal applications: experimental and finite-element analysis. Ferguson SJ; Visser JM; Polikeit A Eur Spine J; 2006 Feb; 15(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 15940477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of hierarchical carbon fiber-reinforced poly (ether-ether-ketone) composites used as implant materials. Qin W; Li Y; Ma J; Liang Q; Tang B J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Jan; 89():227-233. PubMed ID: 30296704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of PEEK Coating on Hip Implant Stress Shielding: A Finite Element Analysis. Anguiano-Sanchez J; Martinez-Romero O; Siller HR; Diaz-Elizondo JA; Flores-Villalba E; Rodriguez CA Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():6183679. PubMed ID: 27051460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can Polyether Ether Ketone Dethrone Titanium as the Choice Implant Material for Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery? Kumar N; Ramakrishnan SA; Lopez KG; Madhu S; Ramos MRD; Fuh JYH; Hallinan J; Nolan CP; Benneker LM; Vellayappan BA World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():94-109. PubMed ID: 33508491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical performance of cranial implants with different thicknesses and material properties: A finite element study. Marcián P; Narra N; Borák L; Chamrad J; Wolff J Comput Biol Med; 2019 Jun; 109():43-52. PubMed ID: 31035070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of wear in composite material orthopaedic implants. Part II: The implant/bone interface. Albert K; Schledjewski R; Harbaugh M; Bleser S; Jamison R; Friedrich K Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(3):199-211. PubMed ID: 7950869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model. Lethaus B; Safi Y; ter Laak-Poort M; Kloss-Brandstätter A; Banki F; Robbenmenke C; Steinseifer U; Kessler P J Neurotrauma; 2012 Apr; 29(6):1077-83. PubMed ID: 22017579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-axial damage and failure of medical grade carbon fibre reinforced PEEK laminates: Experimental testing and computational modelling. Gallagher EA; Lamorinière S; McGarry P J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Jun; 82():154-167. PubMed ID: 29601987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]