These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22098943)

  • 1. Comparison of digital with film radiographs for the classification of pneumoconiotic pleural abnormalities.
    Larson TC; Holiday DB; Antao VC; Thomas J; Pinheiro G; Kapil V; Franzblau A
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 22098943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing film and digital radiographs for reliability of pneumoconiosis classifications: a modeling approach.
    Sen A; Lee SY; Gillespie BW; Kazerooni EA; Goodsitt MM; Rosenman KD; Lockey JE; Meyer CA; Petsonk EL; Wang ML; Franzblau A
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 20207319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of digital radiographs with film radiographs for the classification of pneumoconiosis.
    Franzblau A; Kazerooni EA; Sen A; Goodsitt MM; Lee SY; Rosenman KD; Lockey JE; Meyer CA; Gillespie BW; Petsonk EL; Wang ML
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jun; 16(6):669-77. PubMed ID: 19345120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intramodality and intermodality comparisons of storage phosphor computed radiography and conventional film-screen radiography in the recognition of small pneumoconiotic opacities.
    Laney AS; Petsonk EL; Attfield MD
    Chest; 2011 Dec; 140(6):1574-1580. PubMed ID: 21622551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A flat-panel detector digital radiography and a storage phosphor computed radiography: screening for pneumoconioses.
    Takashima Y; Suganuma N; Sakurazawa H; Itoh H; Hirano H; Shida H; Kusaka Y
    J Occup Health; 2007 Jan; 49(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 17314465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of body mass index on the detection of radiographic localized pleural thickening.
    Larson TC; Franzblau A; Lewin M; Goodman AB; Antao VC
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24331259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and validity of soft copy images based on flat-panel detector in pneumoconiosis classification: comparison with the analog radiographs.
    Lee WJ; Choi BS
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 23535192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value of digital tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary lesions on chest radiography: analysis of diagnostic accuracy and confidence.
    Quaia E; Baratella E; Cioffi V; Bregant P; Cernic S; Cuttin R; Cova MA
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1267-74. PubMed ID: 20591695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chest imaging with a selenium detector versus conventional film radiography: a CT-controlled study.
    van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA
    Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 8756915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the international labour office digitized standard images for recognition and classification of radiographs of pneumoconiosis.
    Halldin CN; Petsonk EL; Laney AS
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 24507420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital chest imaging: comparison of two film image digitizers with a classification task.
    Kundel HL; Mezrich JL; Brickman I; Siegel R; Miller WT; Epstein DM; Gefter WB; Arenson RL; Seshadri SB; Khalsa S
    Radiology; 1987 Dec; 165(3):747-52. PubMed ID: 3685354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of digital direct readout radiography with conventional film-screen radiography for the recognition of pneumoconiosis in dust-exposed Chinese workers.
    Mao L; Laney AS; Wang ML; Sun X; Zhou S; Shi J; Shi H
    J Occup Health; 2011; 53(5):320-6. PubMed ID: 21778659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pneumoconiosis: comparison of digitized and conventional radiographs.
    Mannino DM; Kennedy RD; Hodous TK
    Radiology; 1993 Jun; 187(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 8497632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A systematic review of digital radiography for the screening and recognition of pneumoconiosis].
    Wang H; Li T
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2014 May; 32(5):327-34. PubMed ID: 25169085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease.
    Schaefer CM; Greene R; Oestmann JW; Hall DA; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Pile-Spellman ER; Rubens JR
    Radiology; 1990 Jan; 174(1):207-10. PubMed ID: 2294549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System.
    Goodman LR; Foley WD; Wilson CR; Rimm AA; Lawson TL
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 3940392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of digital selenium radiography with an analog screen-film system in the diagnostic process of pneumoconiosis according to ILO classification].
    Zähringer M; Piekarski C; Saupe M; Braun W; Winnekendonk G; Gossmann A; Krüger K; Krug B
    Rofo; 2001 Oct; 173(10):942-8. PubMed ID: 11588684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Between- and within-reader variability in the assessment of pleural abnormality using the ILO 1980 international classification of pneumoconioses.
    Bourbeau J; Ernst P
    Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 3228068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance.
    Miró SP; Leung AN; Rubin GD; Choi YH; Kee ST; Mindelzun RE; Stark P; Wexler L; Plevritis SK; Betts BJ
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 11161174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.