These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Posterior porcelain inlay: clinical procedures and laboratory technique. Fuzzi M; Bonfiglioli R; Di Febo G; Marin C; Caldari R; Tonelli MP Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1989; 9(4):274-87. PubMed ID: 2701099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays. Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC; Lee RB Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 11843445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of the fit of porcelain inlays. Qualtrough AJ; Sharp RA; Piddock V Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Jun; 4(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 9171024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Inlay and onlay technic today. Modelling of cast gold inlays]. Suckert R; Kohler W Dent Labor (Munch); 1990 Feb; 38(2):215-20, 222. PubMed ID: 2209951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Esthetic posterior restorations utilizing the double-inlay technique: a novel approach in esthetic dentistry. Hannig M; Schmeiser R Quintessence Int; 1997 Feb; 28(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 10332359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Inlay-/onlay-technic with glass ceramic]. Baganz D Quintessenz Zahntech; 1987 Dec; 13(12):1367-87. PubMed ID: 3330821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A porcelain-fused-to-metal MOD onlay. Shillingburg HT; Brooks TD; Clark TL Quintessence Dent Technol; 1986 Jun; 10(6):355-7. PubMed ID: 3461497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Molin MK; Karlsson SL Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Preparation of galvanized silver models in inlay, crown and bridge technics]. Schäffer H Quintessenz Zahntech; 1986 Dec; 12(12):1267-79. PubMed ID: 3295962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evolution, conception and technology of fixed prosthesis made of ceramic and metal]. Rivault MA Rev Fr Odontostomatol; 1966 Oct; 13(8):1367-402. PubMed ID: 5333859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Magne P; Belser UC Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of cavity form and setting expansion of refractory dies on adaptability of fired ceramic inlays. Hayashi M; Miura M; Nishimura N; Takeshige F; Ebisu S Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11203788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]