These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22099919)

  • 1. Perioperative comparative effectiveness research.
    Memtsoudis SG; Besculides MC
    Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 25(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 22099919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perioperative effectiveness research using large databases.
    Freundlich RE; Kheterpal S
    Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 25(4):489-98. PubMed ID: 22099915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.
    Sox HC
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.
    Witt CM
    J Ethnopharmacol; 2013 May; 147(1):254-8. PubMed ID: 23458921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
    Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
    Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of comparative effectiveness research in transfusion medicine clinical trials: proceedings of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.
    Blajchman MA; Carson JL; Eikelboom JW; Heddle NM; Lacroix J; Lauer MS; Platt R; Tilley B; Triulzi D; Vickers AJ; Yusuf S; Glynn S; Mondoro TH; Wagner E
    Transfusion; 2012 Jun; 52(6):1363-78. PubMed ID: 22486525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The past, present, and future of comparative effectiveness research in the US Department of Veterans Affairs.
    Kupersmith J; Ommaya AK
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e3-7. PubMed ID: 21184864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overview of best practices in conducting comparative-effectiveness reviews.
    Guise JM; Viswanathan M
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Dec; 90(6):876-82. PubMed ID: 22048219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
    Neely JG; Sharon JD; Graboyes EM; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Grindler DJ; Dassopoulos T;
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):804-12. PubMed ID: 24098005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.
    Hahn OM; Schilsky RL
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4194-201. PubMed ID: 23071239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Overview of design, implementation and analysis of comparative effectiveness research].
    Liao X; Xie YM; Tian F; Shen H
    Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 38(6):930-5. PubMed ID: 23717982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research.
    Shah BR; Drozda J; Peterson ED
    Am Heart J; 2010 Jul; 160(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20598966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative effectiveness research in kidney disease: a national priority.
    Boulware LE
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2013 Jan; 61(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 22959713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An overview of methods for comparative effectiveness research.
    Meyer AM; Wheeler SB; Weinberger M; Chen RC; Carpenter WR
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24314337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific and organizational collaboration in comparative effectiveness research: the VA cooperative studies program model.
    Huang GD; Ferguson RE; Peduzzi PN; O'Leary TJ
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e24-31. PubMed ID: 21184863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Invited article: comparative effectiveness research, evidence-based medicine, and the AAN.
    French JA; England JD
    Neurology; 2010 Aug; 75(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 20697109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
    Sox HC; Goodman SN
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative effectiveness research through the looking glass.
    Levy A; Harrigan B; Johnston K; Briggs A
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(6):NP6-8. PubMed ID: 19959806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximizing the clinical utility of comparative effectiveness research.
    Umscheid CA
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Dec; 88(6):876-9. PubMed ID: 20962776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emerging analytical techniques for comparative effectiveness research.
    Brunelli SM; Rassen JA
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2013 Jan; 61(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 23021799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.