These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22099951)

  • 1. At the mercy of prior entry: Prior entry induced by invisible primes is not susceptible to current intentions.
    Weiss K; Scharlau I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 22099951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Somatosensory prior entry assessed with temporal order judgments and simultaneity judgments.
    Yates MJ; Nicholls ME
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1586-603. PubMed ID: 21487928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prior-entry: a review.
    Spence C; Parise C
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):364-79. PubMed ID: 20056554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safe or out: Does the location of attention affect judgments at first base in baseball?
    Redden RS; d'Entremont G; Klein RM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Jun; 71(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 28604051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneity and temporal order perception: Different sides of the same coin? Evidence from a visual prior-entry study.
    Weiss K; Scharlau I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Feb; 64(2):394-416. PubMed ID: 20694919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Large effects of peripheral cues on appearance correlate with low precision.
    Kerzel D; Zarian L; Gauch A; Buetti S
    J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(11):26. PubMed ID: 20884521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal attention shortens perceptual latency: a temporal prior entry effect.
    Seibold VC; Fiedler A; Rolke B
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):708-17. PubMed ID: 20883507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention and the speed of information processing: posterior entry for unattended stimuli instead of prior entry for attended stimuli.
    Weiß K; Hilkenmeier F; Scharlau I
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54257. PubMed ID: 23382884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order perception.
    McDonald JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Di Russo F; Hillyard SA
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 8(9):1197-202. PubMed ID: 16056224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prior entry and temporal attention: cueing affects order errors in RSVP.
    Hilkenmeier F; Olivers CN; Scharlau I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):180-90. PubMed ID: 22082215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 'Prior entry' for pain: attention speeds the perceptual processing of painful stimuli.
    Zampini M; Bird KS; Bentley DE; Watson A; Barrett G; Jones AK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 414(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 17197082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further evidence in favor of prior entry from endogenous attention to a location in space.
    Redden RS; d'Entremont G; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1027-1038. PubMed ID: 28281160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Somatosensory prior entry.
    Yates MJ; Nicholls ME
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):847-59. PubMed ID: 19429963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal order is coded temporally in the brain: early event-related potential latency shifts underlying prior entry in a cross-modal temporal order judgment task.
    Vibell J; Klinge C; Zampini M; Spence C; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):109-20. PubMed ID: 17214568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing temporal order judgments and choice reaction time tasks as indices of exogenous spatial cuing.
    Eskes GA; Klein RM; Dove MB; Coolican J; Shore DI
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Nov; 166(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 17889372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.
    Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prior information of stimulus location: effects on ERP measures of visual selection and response selection.
    Praamstra P
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1072(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 16406014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
    Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention biases decisions but does not alter appearance.
    Schneider KA; Komlos M
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):3.1-10. PubMed ID: 19146287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cuing task.
    Ansorge U; Neumann O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):762-77. PubMed ID: 16131248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.