BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22100085)

  • 1. Porcelain monolayers and porcelain/alumina bilayers reinforced by Al2O3/GdAlO3 fibers.
    Sgura R; Medeiros IS; Cesar PF; Campos AA; Hernandes AC
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jan; 5(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 22100085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Al2O3/GdAlO3 fiber for dental porcelain reinforcement.
    Medeiros IS; Luz LA; Yoshimura HN; Cesar PF; Hernandes AC
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2009 Oct; 2(5):471-7. PubMed ID: 19627853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flexural strength of glass-infiltrated zirconia/alumina-based ceramics and feldspathic veneering porcelains.
    Bottino MA; Salazar-Marocho SM; Leite FP; Vásquez VC; Valandro LF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 19432762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics.
    Lin WS; Ercoli C; Feng C; Morton D
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 22462639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strength of the porcelain repair system to all-ceramic copings and porcelain.
    Lee SJ; Cheong CW; Wright RF; Chang BM
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 23725343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of subcritical crack growth in dental ceramics using fracture mechanics and fractography.
    Taskonak B; Griggs JA; Mecholsky JJ; Yan JH
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):700-7. PubMed ID: 17845817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probability of failure of veneered glass fiber-reinforced composites and glass-infiltrated alumina with or without zirconia reinforcement.
    Chong KH; Chai J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 14651232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast ratio and masking ability of three ceramic veneering materials.
    Shono NN; Al Nahedh HN
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):406-16. PubMed ID: 22339384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
    Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
    Vult von Steyern P
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strength, microhardness, and core/veneer interface quality of an all-ceramic system.
    Fahmy NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Feb; 19(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 20040030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of a glass-infiltrated alumina/zirconia-reinforced dental ceramic.
    Guazzato M; Albakry M; Quach L; Swain MV
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):454-63. PubMed ID: 15826702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of different aging methods on the mechanical behavior of multi-layered ceramic structures.
    Borba M; de Araújo MD; Fukushima KA; Yoshimura HN; Griggs JA; Della Bona Á; Cesar PF
    Dent Mater; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1536-1542. PubMed ID: 27726968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexural strength of a glass-infiltrated alumina dental ceramic incorporated with silicon carbide whiskers.
    Tan SC; Chai J; Wozniak WT; Takahashi Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 11508091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics.
    Dündar M; Ozcan M; Gökçe B; Cömlekoğlu E; Leite F; Valandro LF
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16844212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning.
    Amaral R; Ozcan M; Bottino MA; Valandro LF
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 16039705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexural strength of In-Ceram alumina and In-Ceram zirconia core materials.
    Chong KH; Chai J; Takahashi Y; Wozniak W
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 11951810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a conditioning method to improve core-veneer bond strength of zirconia restorations.
    Teng J; Wang H; Liao Y; Liang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):380-7. PubMed ID: 22633594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials.
    Kim BK; Bae HE; Shim JS; Lee KW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 16198173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of sodalite zeolite infiltration on the coefficient of thermal expansion and bond strength of all-ceramic dental prostheses.
    Naji GA; Omar RA; Yahya R
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Mar; 67():135-143. PubMed ID: 28006713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.