88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22100099)
1. The effect of the addition of hydroxyapatite graft substitutes upon the hoop strain and subsequent subsidence of a femoral model during impaction bone grafting.
McNamara IR; Rayment A; Brooks R; Best S; Rushton N
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jan; 5(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 22100099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tricalcium-phosphate and hydroxyapatite bone-graft extender for use in impaction grafting revision surgery. An in vitro study on human femora.
van Haaren EH; Smit TH; Phipps K; Wuisman PI; Blunn G; Heyligers IC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 87(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 15736755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors affecting the cohesion of impaction bone graft.
Oakley J; Kuiper JH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jun; 88(6):828-31. PubMed ID: 16720782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impaction bone grafting with hydroxyapatite: increased femoral component stability in experiments using Sawbones.
Fujishiro T; Nishikawa T; Niikura T; Takikawa S; Nishiyama T; Mizuno K; Yoshiya S; Kurosaka M
Acta Orthop; 2005 Aug; 76(4):550-4. PubMed ID: 16195073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vibration-assisted bone-graft compaction in impaction bone grafting of the femur.
Bolland BJ; New AM; Madabhushi SP; Oreffo RO; Dunlop DG
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 May; 89(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 17540758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A preclinical study of stem subsidence and graft incorporation after femoral impaction grafting using porous hydroxyapatite as a bone graft extender.
Howie DW; McGee MA; Callary SA; Carbone A; Stamenkov RB; Bruce WJ; Findlay DM
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Oct; 26(7):1050-6. PubMed ID: 21802252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A hydroxyapatite graft substitute reduces subsidence in a femoral impaction grafting model.
Munro NA; Downing MR; Meakin JR; Lee AJ; Ashcroft GP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Feb; 455():246-52. PubMed ID: 16967033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical properties of morcellised bone graft with the addition of hydroxyapatite.
McNamara I; Howard J; Rayment A; Schalk R; Brooks R; Best S; Rushton N
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2014 Feb; 25(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 24390340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cemented cup stability during lever-out testing after acetabular bone impaction grafting with bone graft substitutes mixes containing morselized cancellous bone and tricalcium phosphate--hydroxyapatite granules.
Arts JJ; Schreurs BW; Buma P; Verdonschot N
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 Jul; 219(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 16050216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adjuvant therapies of bone graft around non-cemented experimental orthopedic implants stereological methods and experiments in dogs.
Baas J
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2008 Aug; 79(330):1-43. PubMed ID: 19065776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histologic analysis of allograft mixed with hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate used in revision femoral impaction bone grafting.
Fujishiro T; Nishikawa T; Niikura T; Takikawa S; Saegusa Y; Kurosaka M; Bauer TW
Orthopedics; 2008 Mar; 31(3):277. PubMed ID: 19292232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of a bioresorbable nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite paste in acetabular bone impaction grafting.
Chris Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Schreurs BW; Buma P
Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(7):1110-8. PubMed ID: 16098583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subsidence in impaction grafting: the effect of adding a ceramic bone graft extender to bone.
Blom AW; Grimm B; Miles AW; Cunningham JL; Learmonth ID
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2002; 216(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 12206523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconstruction of femoral defects in revision hip surgery: risk of fracture and stem migration after impaction bone grafting.
Barker R; Takahashi T; Toms A; Gregson P; Kuiper JH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jun; 88(6):832-6. PubMed ID: 16720783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In-vitro study of medial strain distribution in the femur during impaction grafting.
Mak SY; Holsgrove TP; Miles AW
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Aug; 221(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 17937200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The development of a model for in vitro testing of femoral stems in impaction bone grafting.
Heal JS; Gozzard C; Gheduzzi S; Grimm B; Learmonth ID; Miles AW
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 May; 221(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 17605395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of rhBMP-2/collagen/TCP-HA bone graft with and without bone marrow cells in the canine femoral multi defect model.
Luangphakdy V; Shinohara K; Pan H; Boehm C; Samaranska A; Muschler GF
Eur Cell Mater; 2015 Jan; 29():57-68; discussion 68-9. PubMed ID: 25579754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morsellised sawbones is an acceptable experimental substitute for the in vitro elastic and viscoelastic mechanical characterisation of morsellised cancellous bone undergoing impaction grafting.
Ayers MP; Clift SE; Gheduzzi S
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jan; 36(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 24075067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A laboratory simulation for morselized bone graft fusion: apparent modulus under operatively based femoral impaction kinetics.
Heiner AD; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):811-8. PubMed ID: 15713302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of vibration on the shear strength of impacted bone graft in revision hip surgery.
Brennan SA; Brabazon D; O'Byrne JM
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jun; 93(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 21586773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]