225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22100443)
1. Cost analysis of abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted myomectomies.
Behera MA; Likes CE; Judd JP; Barnett JC; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 22100443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and costs.
Nash K; Feinglass J; Zei C; Lu G; Mengesha B; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Lin A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):435-40. PubMed ID: 21779774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of the impact of body mass index on the surgical outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy.
George A; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(6):730-3. PubMed ID: 19896599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy is an improvement over laparotomy in women with a limited number of myomas.
Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes TL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 20303834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy outcomes with laparoscopic myomectomy.
Göçmen A; Şanlıkan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 22933121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perioperative Outcomes of Myomectomy for Extreme Myoma Burden: Comparison of Surgical Approaches.
Jansen LJ; Clark NV; Dmello M; Gu X; Einarsson JI; Cohen SL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1095-1103. PubMed ID: 30391510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the costs of laparoscopic myomectomy and open myomectomy at a teaching hospital in southern Taiwan.
Chang CC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 52(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 23915856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy.
Bedient CE; Magrina JF; Noble BN; Kho RM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 201(6):566.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19683685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: comparison with abdominal myomectomy].
Ranisavljevic N; Mercier G; Masia F; Mares P; De Tayrac R; Triopon G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Sep; 41(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 22743064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the initial surgical experience with robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy.
Pluchino N; Litta P; Freschi L; Russo M; Simi G; Santoro AN; Angioni S; Gadducci A; Cela V
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Jun; 10(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 24123629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
Barnett JC; Judd JP; Wu JM; Scales CD; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 116(3):685-693. PubMed ID: 20733453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. National trends and determinants of hospitalization costs and lengths-of-stay for uterine fibroids procedures.
Becker ER
J Health Care Finance; 2007; 33(3):1-16. PubMed ID: 19175228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic uterine vessel occlusion in the treatment of women with symptomatic uterine myomas with and without adding laparoscopic myomectomy: 4-year results.
Wang PH; Liu WM; Fuh JL; Chao HT; Chao KC; Yuan CC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):712-8. PubMed ID: 18971134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy--a retrospective matched control study.
Nezhat C; Lavie O; Hsu S; Watson J; Barnett O; Lemyre M
Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):556-9. PubMed ID: 18377901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
